Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S968726AbXEIGog (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2007 02:44:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S967702AbXEIGo0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2007 02:44:26 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:51437 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S967716AbXEIGo0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2007 02:44:26 -0400 From: Bernhard Schiffner To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: CFS & rt-preempt : orthogonal patches possible ? Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 08:44:18 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705090844.19000.bernhard@schiffner-limbach.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/Stp3CekrypHll3xPkrI6y6b/jQRu5MEz2Zmc QqyH76nmuZoBva7nVo/9QtLVp1Nw7a94KdWVoSDSfPHoDll9KC mN5C6fN1ui2ctUOPESXgq4JbsBXlq6T Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 621 Lines: 23 Hallo (Ingo), testing something regarding linuxpps I want to do it against the "latest and greatest kernel ever" too. rt-preempt is common from audio already. CFS something new and promising. But the patches conflict in their combination. Is there something against this type of combination? Is there perhaps a solution? TIA Bernhard PS: ck's SD-patch conflicts too... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/