Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com>
To:     andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com
Cc:     andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
        daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kafai@fb.com,
        kpsingh@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        shuah@kernel.org, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
        ytcoode@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Fix incorrect TRUNNER_BINARY name output
Date:   Thu, 28 Apr 2022 22:01:30 +0800
Message-Id: <20220428140130.2011452-1-ytcoode@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzbgaqWhFDQTZHDa6w7y02_f8JeoQoj30Zk2rzDe2UfZDg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEf4BzbgaqWhFDQTZHDa6w7y02_f8JeoQoj30Zk2rzDe2UfZDg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Andrii,

I didn't run into any real problems, the purpose of this patch was to make
the output more consistent with expectations.

It confused me when I ran 'make test_progs' but saw [test_maps] output, I
even doubted whether I ran the correct command at first.

But as you said, it's not a big deal, I'm okay with keeping it as it is.

Thanks,
Yuntao