Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <588c073f-0efe-fa38-388f-143ed54afd20@samsung.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Apr 2022 17:33:34 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
        Thunderbird/91.8.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/16] block: add blk_queue_zone_aligned and
 bdev_zone_aligned helper
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>, <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
        <axboe@kernel.dk>, <snitzer@kernel.org>, <hch@lst.de>,
        <mcgrof@kernel.org>, <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>, <sagi@grimberg.me>,
        <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>, <dsterba@suse.com>,
        <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
CC:     <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <clm@fb.com>,
        <gost.dev@samsung.com>, <chao@kernel.org>, <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
        <jonathan.derrick@linux.dev>, <agk@redhat.com>,
        <kbusch@kernel.org>, <kch@nvidia.com>,
        <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>, <jiangbo.365@bytedance.com>,
        <matias.bjorling@wdc.com>, <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
From:   Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
In-Reply-To: <df8104aa-ca86-4053-5334-3bc4ff786c61@acm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
CMS-TYPE: 201P
References: <20220427160255.300418-1-p.raghav@samsung.com>
        <CGME20220427160258eucas1p19548a7094f67b4c9f340add776f60082@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
        <20220427160255.300418-3-p.raghav@samsung.com>
        <df8104aa-ca86-4053-5334-3bc4ff786c61@acm.org>
Precedence: bulk

On 2022-04-28 01:52, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 4/27/22 09:02, Pankaj Raghav wrote:
>> +static inline bool bdev_zone_aligned(struct block_device *bdev,
>> sector_t sec)
>> +{
>> +    struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
>> +
>> +    if (q)
>> +        return blk_queue_zone_aligned(q, sec);
>> +    return false;
>> +}
> 
> Which patch uses this function? I can't find any patch in this series
> that introduces a call to this function.
> 
Initially I used it but at the end I had to remove that patch but I
forgot to remove this function. Thanks for pointing it out. I will fix
it up in the next rev.
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.
> 
>