Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:38:42 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Cc:     Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>, stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
        Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable 0/3] SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID backport to 4.14 and
 4.19
Message-ID: <YmukEb1gyBKXIDUP@kroah.com>
References: <20220406192956.3291614-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
 <20220408152929.4zd2mclusdpazclv@skbuf>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220408152929.4zd2mclusdpazclv@skbuf>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 03:29:30PM +0000, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Hello Greg, Sasha,
> 
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 10:29:53PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > As discussed with Willem here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CA+FuTSdQ57O6RWj_Lenmu_Vd3NEX9xMzMYkB0C3rKMzGgcPc6A@mail.gmail.com/T/
> > 
> > the kernel silently doesn't act upon the SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID socket
> > option in several cases on older kernels, yet user space has no way to
> > find out about this, practically resulting in broken functionality.
> > 
> > This patch set backports the support towards linux-4.14.y and linux-4.19.y,
> > which fixes the issue described above by simply making the kernel act
> > upon SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID as expected.
> > 
> > Testing was done with the most recent (not the vintage-correct one)
> > kselftest script at:
> > tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/txtimestamp.sh
> > with the message "OK. All tests passed".
> 
> Could you please pick up these backports for "stable"? Thanks.

Do you not already see these in a released kernel?  If not, please
resubmit what is missing as I think they are all there...

thanks,

greg k-h