Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757189AbXEIKf4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2007 06:35:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754833AbXEIKfr (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2007 06:35:47 -0400 Received: from aun.it.uu.se ([130.238.12.36]:58145 "EHLO aun.it.uu.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754737AbXEIKfq (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2007 06:35:46 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 12:35:40 +0200 (MEST) Message-Id: <200705091035.l49AZeto017530@harpo.it.uu.se> From: Mikael Pettersson To: buytenh@wantstofly.org, marcus@better.se Subject: Re: [PATCH] Intel IXP4xx network drivers v.2 - Ethernet and HSS Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1110 Lines: 24 On Wed, 9 May 2007 11:35:03 +0200, Marcus Better wrote: > Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > > Does that mean that the Debian ARM people have their heads so far > > up their collective asses that they think that every form of change > > is bad and are unable to accept that some forms of change might be > > for the better? > > Well, I am not one of the Debian ARM people, just a user... and I do hope the > EABI port becomes supported in the future! But in the meatime there is a > crowd of users running Debian on consumer devices like the NSLU2, and they > need a LE network driver. 1) Development _should_ happen in small individually-manageable steps. It's wrong to delay integration of the new IXP4xx eth driver just because it's not yet LE-compatible. 2) LE Debian/ARM users do have alternatives: they can use USB-Ethernet adapters, for instance. /Mikael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/