Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <c557350bdcb1fc2bf73aa30dd631d198f41a5071.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 36/37] usb: handle HAS_IOPORT dependencies
From:   Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
        Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
        "open list:USB SUBSYSTEM" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:49:20 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20220429135108.2781579-66-schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
References: <20220429135108.2781579-1-schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
         <20220429135108.2781579-66-schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 2022-04-29 at 15:51 +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> not being declared. We thus need to guard sections of code calling them
> as alternative access methods with CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT checks. Similarly
> drivers requiring these functions need to depend on HAS_IOPORT.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
> ---

Sorry everyone. I sent this as PATCH in error while preparing to sent
the same series as RFC. Since e-mail has no remote delete and I lack a
time machine let's just all pretend you only got the RFC.