Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 29 Apr 2022 11:12:59 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20220429181259.622060-1-dlatypov@google.com>
Message-Id: <20220429181259.622060-4-dlatypov@google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
References: <20220429181259.622060-1-dlatypov@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] kunit: fix debugfs code to use enum kunit_status, not bool
From:   Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
To:     brendanhiggins@google.com, davidgow@google.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
        Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Commit 6d2426b2f258 ("kunit: Support skipped tests") switched to using
`enum kunit_status` to track the result of running a test/suite since we
now have more than just pass/fail.

This callsite wasn't updated, silently converting to enum to a bool and
then back.

Fixes: 6d2426b2f258 ("kunit: Support skipped tests")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
---
v1 -> v2: added this patch.
---
 lib/kunit/debugfs.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/kunit/debugfs.c b/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
index b71db0abc12b..1048ef1b8d6e 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/debugfs.c
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static void debugfs_print_result(struct seq_file *seq,
 static int debugfs_print_results(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 {
 	struct kunit_suite *suite = (struct kunit_suite *)seq->private;
-	bool success = kunit_suite_has_succeeded(suite);
+	enum kunit_status success = kunit_suite_has_succeeded(suite);
 	struct kunit_case *test_case;
 
 	if (!suite || !suite->log)
-- 
2.36.0.464.gb9c8b46e94-goog