Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <832eecc5-9569-1d95-6ab8-f029b660dfcb@igalia.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:46:35 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.8.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/30] tracing: Improve panic/die notifiers
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@gmail.com>
Cc:     akpm@linux-foundation.org, bhe@redhat.com, pmladek@suse.com,
        kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, coresight@lists.linaro.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
        rcu@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
        xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, x86@kernel.org,
        kernel-dev@igalia.com, kernel@gpiccoli.net, halves@canonical.com,
        fabiomirmar@gmail.com, alejandro.j.jimenez@oracle.com,
        andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, arnd@arndb.de, bp@alien8.de,
        corbet@lwn.net, d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com,
        dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, dyoung@redhat.com,
        feng.tang@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        mikelley@microsoft.com, hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com,
        jgross@suse.com, john.ogness@linutronix.de, keescook@chromium.org,
        luto@kernel.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
        paulmck@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, senozhatsky@chromium.org,
        stern@rowland.harvard.edu, tglx@linutronix.de, vgoyal@redhat.com,
        vkuznets@redhat.com, will@kernel.org
References: <20220427224924.592546-1-gpiccoli@igalia.com>
 <20220427224924.592546-18-gpiccoli@igalia.com>
 <b8771b37-01f5-f50b-dbb3-9db4ee26e67e@gmail.com>
 <20220429092351.10bca4dd@gandalf.local.home>
From:   "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220429092351.10bca4dd@gandalf.local.home>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 29/04/2022 10:23, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 12:22:44 +0300
> Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>> +	switch (ev) {
>>> +	case DIE_OOPS:
>>> +		do_dump = 1;
>>> +		break;
>>> +	case PANIC_NOTIFIER:
>>> +		do_dump = 1;
>>> +		break;  
>>
>>    Why not:
>>
>> 	case DIE_OOPS:
>> 	case PANIC_NOTIFIER:
>> 		do_dump = 1;
>> 		break;
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> Other than that.
> 
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> 
> -- Steve

Thanks Sergei and Steven, good idea! I thought about the switch change
you propose, but I confess I got a bit confused by the "fallthrough"
keyword - do I need to use it?

About the s/int/bool, for sure! Not sure why I didn't use bool at
first...heheh

Cheers,


Guilherme