Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220426131102.23966-1-andrea.merello@gmail.com>
 <CAHp75VcoXu=0yvxmTwGAzexV_MgACXg-Cufkigt_kCEvbnwq_Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20220501180303.75a0d0a5@jic23-huawei> <CAN8YU5PYkQhqrGP8qUK6BgVWVWWECQvYGrSiREU7P5r4kFxVjA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN8YU5PYkQhqrGP8qUK6BgVWVWWECQvYGrSiREU7P5r4kFxVjA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 2 May 2022 09:47:47 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcFZYyU0ap8WSBCTTpsUtDmC6TqURLOpAOKxYNtbLHAOg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [v5 00/14] Add support for Bosch BNO055 IMU
To:     Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@gmail.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Matt Ranostay <matt.ranostay@konsulko.com>,
        Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>,
        jmondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>,
        Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@iit.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 8:33 AM Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@gmail.com> wrote:
> Il giorno dom 1 mag 2022 alle ore 18:54 Jonathan Cameron
> <jic23@kernel.org> ha scritto:
> > On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 15:42:49 +0200
> > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 3:11 PM Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@gmail.com> wrote:

...

> > > FWIW,
> > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
> > > for non-commented patches (12 out of 14 AFAICS).
> > >
> > FWIW I'm fine with the series once you've tidied up the stuff Andy picked up
> > on.
> >
> > Thanks Andy for the detailed reviewing btw.

You/re welcome!

> I'm very grateful to both of you and to everyone who commented on
> those patches. Thanks :). Beside the "Reviewed-by" tags where
> appropriate, is it usual/appropriate to put some tag like "Thanks-to
> .. [for comments]" ?

Nope, just mention that in the cover letter.

> BTW I have also gone through some kernel-robot reports; they also
> state "If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>". I'd say that it would
> be OK to add this tag to a patch that just fixes what is reported, but
> I'm unsure whether it is appropriate to add this tag to the patches in
> my series, because they add the code and the fix at once. Any advice
> here?

For this we specifically amended the kernel documentation recently.
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#using-reported-by-tested-by-reviewed-by-suggested-by-and-fixes

"The tag is intended for bugs; please do not use it to credit feature requests."

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko