Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Mon, 2 May 2022 10:59:21 -0700
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] objtool: Fix STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD reloc type
Message-ID: <20220502175921.oruktb6dleabvdyx@treble>
References: <20220429092024.GT2731@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <YmvTbN966XmLSZk+@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20220429225636.6qm2orq4uwnl33ii@treble>
 <Ym0hAA66vijBo7iF@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Ym0hAA66vijBo7iF@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 01:44:00PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > I also don't see any kprobe/optprobe hooks in unwind.h, so what happens
> > > if we hit an optprobe?
> > 
> > Same as for any other generated code, the unwinder will try to fall back
> > to frame pointers, and if that doesn't work, the unwind stops.
> > 
> > That commit didn't change anything since it was already not being
> > directly executed anyway, but rather used to generate code on the fly.
> > 
> > And before that commit it was being ignored by ORC anyway, thanks to
> > STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD.  Which can now be removed since this code is
> > now data and objtool will no longer try to understand it.
> 
> Right; but I suppose I'm wondering if we should fix this. It seems a
> rather sub-optimal state of affairs.

Masami recently fixed some kprobes ORC issues but I don't know if this
one was fixed.

As to the whether it's worth fixing, I dunno.  There are trade offs.

Depends on how common the stack trace is -- I'm guessing not very, since
I've never seen a bug report -- and how important it is to get to full
ORC coverage.  If our goal is full coverage, we'd need a way for
generated code to add/remove ORC entries.

-- 
Josh