Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758242AbXEIRPj (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2007 13:15:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757428AbXEIRPS (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2007 13:15:18 -0400 Received: from mtagate3.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.152]:33254 "EHLO mtagate3.de.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757218AbXEIRPQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2007 13:15:16 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 19:14:35 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck To: david@lang.hm Cc: Greg KH , Linus Torvalds , Adrian Bunk , linux-kernel Subject: Re: Please revert 5adc55da4a7758021bcc374904b0f8b076508a11 (PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE) Message-ID: <20070509191435.695765ce@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20070508153713.344cc881@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <20070508141149.GJ4226@stusta.de> <20070508183846.28a94797@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <20070509095302.GA13053@kroah.com> <20070509153813.52a7c397@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <20070509164207.GA28633@kroah.com> Organization: IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i486-pc-linux-gnu) X-Legal: IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Johann Weihen =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrung:?= Herbert Kircher Sitz der Gesellschaft: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?B=F6blingen?= Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1148 Lines: 27 On Wed, 9 May 2007 09:50:09 -0700 (PDT), david@lang.hm wrote: > On Wed, 9 May 2007, Greg KH wrote: > > Why is it dead? Since when is PCI the only bus in the system? > > correct, while this discussion started over the PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE it's > focusing on the generic problem that would apply to any bus s/multithreaded/async/ (more generic and better describing what we want imo) That's why I said the multithreaded approach was dead (sorry if that was confusing). > I don't think anyone is saying that PCI is the problem here. We're trying > to identify what needs to be done for any arbatrary bus, if a particular > bus doesn't need to split it's initialization up becouse there are no > delays (and therefor no gains for multithreading) then drivers for that > bus don't bother to implement any async portion. Exactly. A general idea/framework on how to do async probing would be good. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/