Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757074AbXEISGR (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2007 14:06:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752844AbXEISGH (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2007 14:06:07 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.174]:49902 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752354AbXEISGE (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2007 14:06:04 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:sender; b=ZBtIrb5HzxC78uryvKnTWhnzPbrQrJrWGztS87VT+0nZ2CqKzBrEWtERGE1H3OuBiwPuXMx4Cga4xYHNVFeQVlSbWx3yPWBppFD7mhW/qAjpMNX7yo2DIC16CucWc/eV2nRUu8w4iCvYrEha0/QYPtG6bJxBJjkWWr+kukffQLw= Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 20:04:52 +0200 From: Frederik Deweerdt To: Andi Kleen Cc: Jan Beulich , Andrew Morton , ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kmem_cache_init failure (was Re: 2.6.21-mm1) Message-ID: <20070509180451.GA17402@slug> References: <20070505014955.8f3990b5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070508172233.GA11683@slug> <46419708.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> <20070509090046.GE17482@one.firstfloor.org> <20070509122608.GC11683@slug> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070509122608.GC11683@slug> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (Linux) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1089 Lines: 25 On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 02:26:08PM +0200, Frederik Deweerdt wrote: > On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 11:00:46AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:40:24AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > >I've bisected it down to the x86_64-mm-cpa-kerneltext.patch and the > > > > > > > >+ if (!pte_present(*kpte)) > > > >+ return 0; > > > > > > I the most recent version of the patch I sent to Andi this line is gone (again), > > > as I realized it was wrong on i386 (namely for DEBUG_PAGEALLOC) and its > > > respective variant was superfluous on x86-64. > > > > Yes the version of the patch that went into Linus' tree doesn't have it. > > Does the problem happen with mainline gitLATEST too? > Andi, > > Latest git is OK with qemu, I'll test it on a real machine tonight. It boots fine on a real PC too. Thanks! Frederik - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/