Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220426131102.23966-1-andrea.merello@gmail.com>
 <CAHp75VcoXu=0yvxmTwGAzexV_MgACXg-Cufkigt_kCEvbnwq_Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20220501180303.75a0d0a5@jic23-huawei> <CAN8YU5PYkQhqrGP8qUK6BgVWVWWECQvYGrSiREU7P5r4kFxVjA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHp75VcFZYyU0ap8WSBCTTpsUtDmC6TqURLOpAOKxYNtbLHAOg@mail.gmail.com> <CAN8YU5Peo8vi0MUqP2hSkKFyO=uAxx_Ad3aXRKBr3zzncS8RPQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN8YU5Peo8vi0MUqP2hSkKFyO=uAxx_Ad3aXRKBr3zzncS8RPQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 2 May 2022 10:52:59 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHp75VeRV-Nv_zw6Qe9huXzqi14GJhWxQEpbbejn0z33zPYKtg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [v5 00/14] Add support for Bosch BNO055 IMU
To:     Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@gmail.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Matt Ranostay <matt.ranostay@konsulko.com>,
        Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>,
        jmondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>,
        Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@iit.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 10:31 AM Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@gmail.com> wrote:
> Il giorno lun 2 mag 2022 alle ore 09:48 Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> ha scritto:

...

> > > BTW I have also gone through some kernel-robot reports; they also
> > > state "If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>". I'd say that it would
> > > be OK to add this tag to a patch that just fixes what is reported, but
> > > I'm unsure whether it is appropriate to add this tag to the patches in
> > > my series, because they add the code and the fix at once. Any advice
> > > here?
> >
> > For this we specifically amended the kernel documentation recently.
> > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#using-reported-by-tested-by-reviewed-by-suggested-by-and-fixes
> >
> > "The tag is intended for bugs; please do not use it to credit feature requests."
>
> Well, no any feature request to credit here; a bug and its fix are
> involved. Sounds more like a "yes" so far.. But it wouldn't be clear
> what the robot did report indeed (squashed bugs and fixes).. Maybe a
> "thank" in the cover letter also to it would suffice?

The reported from bots should be used when your patches.changes
induced by those reports, it seems otherwise in your case.,


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko