Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Tue, 3 May 2022 10:30:25 +0800
From:   Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@linux.dev>
To:     Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@linux.dev>
Cc:     mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
        dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com,
        mgorman@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, parth@linux.ibm.com,
        qais.yousef@arm.com, chris.hyser@oracle.com,
        pkondeti@codeaurora.org, vschneid@redhat.com,
        patrick.bellasi@matbug.net, David.Laight@aculab.com,
        pjt@google.com, pavel@ucw.cz, tj@kernel.org,
        dhaval.giani@oracle.com, qperret@google.com,
        tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/6] sched/fair: Take into account latency nice at wakeup
Message-ID: <YnCTwQlDFPfFOJJ3@geo.homenetwork>
References: <20220311161406.23497-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
 <20220311161406.23497-6-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
 <Ym6uMoHVkqr9zOpj@geo.homenetwork>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Ym6uMoHVkqr9zOpj@geo.homenetwork>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 11:58:42PM +0800, Tao Zhou wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
> 
> Change to Valentin Schneider's now using mail address.
> 
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 05:14:05PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> 
> > Take into account the nice latency priority of a thread when deciding to
> > preempt the current running thread. We don't want to provide more CPU
> > bandwidth to a thread but reorder the scheduling to run latency sensitive
> > task first whenever possible.
> > 
> > As long as a thread didn't use its bandwidth, it will be able to preempt
> > the current thread.
> > 
> > At the opposite, a thread with a low latency priority will preempt current
> > thread at wakeup only to keep fair CPU bandwidth sharing. Otherwise it will
> > wait for the tick to get its sched slice.
> > 
> >                                    curr vruntime
> >                                        |
> >                       sysctl_sched_wakeup_granularity
> >                                    <-->
> > ----------------------------------|----|-----------------------|---------------
> >                                   |    |<--------------------->
> >                                   |    .  sysctl_sched_latency
> >                                   |    .
> > default/current latency entity    |    .
> >                                   |    .
> > 1111111111111111111111111111111111|0000|-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-
> > se preempts curr at wakeup ------>|<- se doesn't preempt curr -----------------
> >                                   |    .
> >                                   |    .
> >                                   |    .
> > low latency entity                |    .
> >                                    ---------------------->|
> >                                % of sysctl_sched_latency  |
> > 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111|0000|-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-
> > preempt ------------------------------------------------->|<- do not preempt --
> >                                   |    .
> >                                   |    .
> >                                   |    .
> > high latency entity               |    .
> >          |<-----------------------|    .
> >          | % of sysctl_sched_latency   .
> > 111111111|0000|-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1
> > preempt->|<- se doesn't preempt curr ------------------------------------------
> > 
> > Tests results of nice latency impact on heavy load like hackbench:
> > 
> > hackbench -l (2560 / group) -g group
> > group        latency 0             latency 19
> > 1            1.450(+/- 0.60%)      1.376(+/- 0.54%) + 5%
> > 4            1.537(+/- 1.75%)      1.335(+/- 1.81%) +13%
> > 8            1.414(+/- 1.91%)      1.348(+/- 1.88%) + 5%
> > 16           1.423(+/- 1.65%)      1.374(+/- 0.58%) + 3%
> > 
> > hackbench -p -l (2560 / group) -g group
> > group
> > 1            1.416(+/- 3.45%)      0.886(+/- 0.54%) +37%
> > 4            1.634(+/- 7.14%)      0.888(+/- 5.40%) +45%
> > 8            1.449(+/- 2.14%)      0.804(+/- 4.55%) +44%
> > 16           0.917(+/- 4.12%)      0.777(+/- 1.41%) +15%
> > 
> > By deacreasing the latency prio, we reduce the number of preemption at
> 
> s/deacreasing/decreasing/
> s/reduce/increase/
> 
> > wakeup and help hackbench making progress.
> > 
> > Test results of nice latency impact on short live load like cyclictest
> > while competing with heavy load like hackbench:
> > 
> > hackbench -l 10000 -g group &
> > cyclictest --policy other -D 5 -q -n
> >         latency 0           latency -20
> > group   min  avg    max     min  avg    max
> > 0       16    17     28      15   17     27
> > 1       61   382  10603      63   89   4628
> > 4       52   437  15455      54   98  16238
> > 8       56   728  38499      61  125  28983
> > 16      53  1215  52207      61  183  80751
> > 
> > group = 0 means that hackbench is not running.
> > 
> > The avg is significantly improved with nice latency -20 especially with
> > large number of groups but min and max remain quite similar. If we add the
> > histogram parameters to get details of latency, we have :
> > 
> > hackbench -l 10000 -g 16 &
> > cyclictest --policy other -D 5 -q -n  -H 20000 --histfile data.txt
> >               latency 0    latency -20
> > Min Latencies:    63           62
> > Avg Latencies:  1397          218
> > Max Latencies: 44926        42291
> > 50% latencies:   100           98
> > 75% latencies:   762          116
> > 85% latencies:  1118          126
> > 90% latencies:  1540          130
> > 95% latencies:  5610          138
> > 99% latencies: 13738          266
> > 
> > With percentile details, we see the benefit of nice latency -20 as
> > 1% of the latencies stays above 266us whereas the default latency has
> > got 25% are above 762us and 10% over the 1ms.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/sched.h |  4 ++-
> >  init/init_task.c      |  2 +-
> >  kernel/sched/core.c   | 32 +++++++++++++++++++----
> >  kernel/sched/debug.c  |  2 +-
> >  kernel/sched/fair.c   | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  kernel/sched/sched.h  | 12 +++++++++
> >  6 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> > index 2aa889a59054..9aeb157e819b 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > @@ -560,6 +560,8 @@ struct sched_entity {
> >  	unsigned long			runnable_weight;
> >  #endif
> >  
> > +	int				latency_weight;
> > +
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Per entity load average tracking.
> > @@ -779,7 +781,7 @@ struct task_struct {
> >  	int				static_prio;
> >  	int				normal_prio;
> >  	unsigned int			rt_priority;
> > -	int				latency_nice;
> > +	int				latency_prio;
> >  
> >  	struct sched_entity		se;
> >  	struct sched_rt_entity		rt;
> > diff --git a/init/init_task.c b/init/init_task.c
> > index 2afa249c253b..e98c71f24981 100644
> > --- a/init/init_task.c
> > +++ b/init/init_task.c
> > @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ struct task_struct init_task
> >  	.prio		= MAX_PRIO - 20,
> >  	.static_prio	= MAX_PRIO - 20,
> >  	.normal_prio	= MAX_PRIO - 20,
> > -	.latency_nice	= 0,
> > +	.latency_prio	= NICE_WIDTH - 20,
> >  	.policy		= SCHED_NORMAL,
> >  	.cpus_ptr	= &init_task.cpus_mask,
> >  	.user_cpus_ptr	= NULL,
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index 8f8b102a75c4..547b0da01efe 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -1241,6 +1241,11 @@ static void set_load_weight(struct task_struct *p, bool update_load)
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void set_latency_weight(struct task_struct *p)
> > +{
> > +	p->se.latency_weight = sched_latency_to_weight[p->latency_prio];
> > +}
> > +
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK
> >  /*
> >   * Serializes updates of utilization clamp values
> > @@ -4394,7 +4399,7 @@ int sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)
> >  	p->prio = current->normal_prio;
> >  
> >  	/* Propagate the parent's latency requirements to the child as well */
> > -	p->latency_nice = current->latency_nice;
> > +	p->latency_prio = current->latency_prio;
> >  
> >  	uclamp_fork(p);
> >  
> > @@ -4412,7 +4417,7 @@ int sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)
> >  		p->prio = p->normal_prio = p->static_prio;
> >  		set_load_weight(p, false);
> >  
> > -		p->latency_nice = DEFAULT_LATENCY_NICE;
> > +		p->latency_prio = NICE_TO_LATENCY(0);
> >  		/*
> >  		 * We don't need the reset flag anymore after the fork. It has
> >  		 * fulfilled its duty:
> > @@ -4420,6 +4425,9 @@ int sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)
> >  		p->sched_reset_on_fork = 0;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	/* Once latency_prio is set, update the latency weight */
> > +	set_latency_weight(p);
> > +
> >  	if (dl_prio(p->prio))
> >  		return -EAGAIN;
> >  	else if (rt_prio(p->prio))
> > @@ -7361,7 +7369,7 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
> >  		if (attr->sched_latency_nice < MIN_LATENCY_NICE)
> >  			return -EINVAL;
> >  		/* Use the same security checks as NICE */
> > -		if (attr->sched_latency_nice < p->latency_nice &&
> > +		if (attr->sched_latency_nice < LATENCY_TO_NICE(p->latency_prio) &&
> >  		    !capable(CAP_SYS_NICE))
> >  			return -EPERM;
> >  	}
> > @@ -7401,7 +7409,7 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
> >  		if (attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP)
> >  			goto change;
> >  		if (attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_LATENCY_NICE &&
> > -		    attr->sched_latency_nice != p->latency_nice)
> > +		    attr->sched_latency_nice != LATENCY_TO_NICE(p->latency_prio))
> >  			goto change;
> >  
> >  		p->sched_reset_on_fork = reset_on_fork;
> > @@ -7942,7 +7950,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(sched_getattr, pid_t, pid, struct sched_attr __user *, uattr,
> >  	get_params(p, &kattr);
> >  	kattr.sched_flags &= SCHED_FLAG_ALL;
> >  
> > -	kattr.sched_latency_nice = p->latency_nice;
> > +	kattr.sched_latency_nice = LATENCY_TO_NICE(p->latency_prio);
> >  
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK
> >  	/*
> > @@ -10954,6 +10962,20 @@ const u32 sched_prio_to_wmult[40] = {
> >   /*  15 */ 119304647, 148102320, 186737708, 238609294, 286331153,
> >  };
> >  
> > +/*
> > + * latency weight for wakeup preemption
> > + */
> > +const int sched_latency_to_weight[40] = {
> > + /* -20 */      1024,       973,       922,       870,       819,
> > + /* -15 */       768,       717,       666,       614,       563,
> > + /* -10 */       512,       461,       410,       358,       307,
> > + /*  -5 */       256,       205,       154,       102,       51,
> > + /*   0 */	   0,       -51,      -102,      -154,      -205,
> > + /*   5 */      -256,      -307,      -358,      -410,      -461,
> > + /*  10 */      -512,      -563,      -614,      -666,      -717,
> > + /*  15 */      -768,      -819,      -870,      -922,      -973,
> > +};
> > +
> >  void call_trace_sched_update_nr_running(struct rq *rq, int count)
> >  {
> >          trace_sched_update_nr_running_tp(rq, count);
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> > index 5d76a8927888..253e52ec73fb 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> > @@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ void proc_sched_show_task(struct task_struct *p, struct pid_namespace *ns,
> >  #endif
> >  	P(policy);
> >  	P(prio);
> > -	P(latency_nice);
> > +	P(latency_prio);
> >  	if (task_has_dl_policy(p)) {
> >  		P(dl.runtime);
> >  		P(dl.deadline);
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index 5c4bfffe8c2c..506c482a0e48 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -5555,6 +5555,35 @@ static int sched_idle_cpu(int cpu)
> >  }
> >  #endif
> >  
> > +static void set_next_buddy(struct sched_entity *se);
> > +
> > +static void check_preempt_from_idle(struct cfs_rq *cfs, struct sched_entity *se)
> > +{
> > +	struct sched_entity *next;
> > +
> > +	if (se->latency_weight <= 0)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	if (cfs->nr_running <= 1)
> > +		return;
> > +	/*
> > +	 * When waking from idle, we don't need to check to preempt at wakeup
> > +	 * the idle thread and don't set next buddy as a candidate for being
> > +	 * picked in priority.
> > +	 * In case of simultaneous wakeup from idle, the latency sensitive tasks
> > +	 * lost opportunity to preempt non sensitive tasks which woke up
> > +	 * simultaneously.
> > +	 */
> > +
> > +	if (cfs->next)
> > +		next = cfs->next;
> > +	else
> > +		next = __pick_first_entity(cfs);
> > +
> > +	if (next && wakeup_preempt_entity(next, se) == 1)
> > +		set_next_buddy(se);
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * The enqueue_task method is called before nr_running is
> >   * increased. Here we update the fair scheduling stats and
> > @@ -5648,6 +5677,9 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
> >  	if (!task_new)
> >  		update_overutilized_status(rq);
> >  
> > +	if (rq->curr == rq->idle)
> > +		check_preempt_from_idle(cfs_rq_of(&p->se), &p->se);
> > +
> >  enqueue_throttle:
> >  	if (cfs_bandwidth_used()) {
> >  		/*
> > @@ -5669,8 +5701,6 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
> >  	hrtick_update(rq);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static void set_next_buddy(struct sched_entity *se);
> > -
> >  /*
> >   * The dequeue_task method is called before nr_running is
> >   * decreased. We remove the task from the rbtree and
> > @@ -6970,6 +7000,27 @@ balance_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
> >  }
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
> >  
> > +static long wakeup_latency_gran(int latency_weight)
> > +{
> > +	long thresh = sysctl_sched_latency;
> > +
> > +	if (!latency_weight)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	if (sched_feat(GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS))
> > +		thresh >>= 1;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Clamp the delta to stay in the scheduler period range
> > +	 * [-sysctl_sched_latency:sysctl_sched_latency]
> > +	 */
> > +	latency_weight = clamp_t(long, latency_weight,
> > +				-1 * NICE_LATENCY_WEIGHT_MAX,
> > +				NICE_LATENCY_WEIGHT_MAX);
> > +
> > +	return (thresh * latency_weight) >> NICE_LATENCY_SHIFT;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static unsigned long wakeup_gran(struct sched_entity *se)
> >  {
> >  	unsigned long gran = sysctl_sched_wakeup_granularity;
> > @@ -7008,6 +7059,10 @@ static int
> >  wakeup_preempt_entity(struct sched_entity *curr, struct sched_entity *se)
> >  {
> >  	s64 gran, vdiff = curr->vruntime - se->vruntime;
> > +	int latency_weight = se->latency_weight - curr->latency_weight;
> > +
> > +	latency_weight = min(latency_weight, se->latency_weight);
> 
> Let lable A=se->latency_weight, B=curr->latency_weight, C=A-B.
> 
> 1 A>0 B>0
>     ::C=A-B<0, min(C,A)=C, latency decrease, C is the real diff value no matter
>       what A is. That means it can be very 'long'(-sched_latency) and vdiff is
>       more possible to be in <= 0 case and return -1.
>     ::C=A-B>0, min(C,A)=A, latency increase, but it is conservative. Limit to
>       A/1024*sched_latency.
>     When latecy is decreased, the negtive value added to vdiff is larger than the
>     positive value added to vdiff when latency is increased.
> 
> 2 A>0 B<0
>     ::C=A-B>0 and C>A, min(C,A)=A, latency increase and it is conservative.
> 
> 3 A<0 B<0
>     ::C=A-B>0, min(C,A)=A, latency increase but min(C,A)<0, I think if latency
>     increase means the value added to vdiff will be a positive value to increase
>     the chance to return 1. I would say it is max(C,A)=C
>     ::C=A-B<0, min(C,A)=A, latency decrease and the real negtive value.
> 
> 4 A<0,B>0
>     ::C=A-B<0, min(C,A)=C, latency decrease and the real negtive value.
> 
> Is there a reason that the value when latency increase and latency decrease
> be treated differently. Latency increase value is limited to se's latency_weight
> but latency decrease value can extend to -sched_latency or treat them the same.
> Penalty latency decrease and conserve latency increase.
> 
> 
> There is any value that this latency_weight can be considered to be a average.
> 
> The delta value choose is ~%5 to 1024. %5*sched_latency=0.05*6ms=0.3ms.(no scale)
> I do not think over that vdiff equation  and others though.

vruntime is the accumulated weight history scaled time.
vdiff is the scaled diff time delta.

latency_gran = [delta_weight|latency_weight]/1024*thresh.
If also to scale this latency_gran to reflect the load weight
distribution in sched_latency like:

latency_gran*1024/load_weight=[delta_weight|latency_weight]/load_weight*thresh.

About [delta_weight|latency_weight]/load_weight. Because latency nice and prio nice
range is the same. Can make a table to const this calculation.. But I do not
make sure that it is valuable to make this change. Just some random inputs..

> Thanks,
> Tao
> > +	vdiff += wakeup_latency_gran(latency_weight);
> >  
> >  	if (vdiff <= 0)
> >  		return -1;
> > @@ -7117,6 +7172,7 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_
> >  		return;
> >  
> >  	update_curr(cfs_rq_of(se));
> > +
> >  	if (wakeup_preempt_entity(se, pse) == 1) {
> >  		/*
> >  		 * Bias pick_next to pick the sched entity that is
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> > index 456ad2159eb1..dd92aa9c36f9 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> > @@ -122,6 +122,17 @@ extern void call_trace_sched_update_nr_running(struct rq *rq, int count);
> >   * Default tasks should be treated as a task with latency_nice = 0.
> >   */
> >  #define DEFAULT_LATENCY_NICE	0
> > +#define DEFAULT_LATENCY_PRIO	(DEFAULT_LATENCY_NICE + LATENCY_NICE_WIDTH/2)
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Convert user-nice values [ -20 ... 0 ... 19 ]
> > + * to static latency [ 0..39 ],
> > + * and back.
> > + */
> > +#define NICE_TO_LATENCY(nice)	((nice) + DEFAULT_LATENCY_PRIO)
> > +#define LATENCY_TO_NICE(prio)	((prio) - DEFAULT_LATENCY_PRIO)
> > +#define NICE_LATENCY_SHIFT	(SCHED_FIXEDPOINT_SHIFT)
> > +#define NICE_LATENCY_WEIGHT_MAX	(1L << NICE_LATENCY_SHIFT)
> >  
> >  /*
> >   * Increase resolution of nice-level calculations for 64-bit architectures.
> > @@ -2098,6 +2109,7 @@ static_assert(WF_TTWU == SD_BALANCE_WAKE);
> >  
> >  extern const int		sched_prio_to_weight[40];
> >  extern const u32		sched_prio_to_wmult[40];
> > +extern const int		sched_latency_to_weight[40];
> >  
> >  /*
> >   * {de,en}queue flags:
> > -- 
> > 2.17.1
> >