Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220412215000.897344-1-richard.gong@amd.com> <d4ba3998-34aa-86d2-bde9-bc6ae9d8d08d@molgen.mpg.de>
 <CADnq5_MgvcGPWf2gYn_3qCr+Gq1P39tvv-W-o8NhivvMpMwUBA@mail.gmail.com>
 <91e916e3-d793-b814-6cbf-abee0667f5f8@molgen.mpg.de> <94fd858d-1792-9c05-b5c6-1b028427687d@amd.com>
 <efc1dfd1-2b54-aee5-1497-4b800a468141@molgen.mpg.de> <237da02b-0ed8-6b1c-3eaf-5574aab4f13f@amd.com>
 <294555b4-2d1b-270f-6682-3a17e9df133c@molgen.mpg.de> <5adfe067-dc00-6567-e218-c5c68670cf5b@amd.com>
 <543a9e76-ca90-984b-b155-a0647cdeacff@molgen.mpg.de>
In-Reply-To: <543a9e76-ca90-984b-b155-a0647cdeacff@molgen.mpg.de>
From:   Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Date:   Tue, 3 May 2022 13:25:53 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPj87rOERk-kNa6n-UdjQsDKXP9zzm8=an=FHcM+33yebW6ECw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4] drm/amdgpu: disable ASPM on Intel Alder Lake based systems
To:     Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Cc:     Richard Gong <richard.gong@amd.com>,
        Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Xinhui Pan <xinhui.pan@amd.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
        Alexander Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=C3=B6nig?= <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
        Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 1 May 2022 at 08:08, Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de> wrote:
> Am 26.04.22 um 15:53 schrieb Gong, Richard:
> > I think so. We captured dmesg log.
>
> Then the (whole) system did *not* freeze, if you could still log in
> (maybe over network) and execute `dmesg`. Please also paste the
> amdgpu(?) error logs in the commit message.
>
> > As mentioned early we need support from Intel on how to get ASPM working
> > for VI generation on Intel Alder Lake, but we don't know where things
> > currently stand.
>
> Who is working on this, and knows?

This has gone beyond the point of a reasonable request. The amount of
detail you're demanding is completely unnecessary.