Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 4 May 2022 12:01:11 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        alex.popov@linux.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        luto@kernel.org, will@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] arm64: stackleak: fix current_top_of_stack()
Message-ID: <202205041200.147A737@keescook>
References: <20220427173128.2603085-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>
 <20220427173128.2603085-2-mark.rutland@arm.com>
 <YnKsvNtIlE6cZEOa@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YnKsvNtIlE6cZEOa@arm.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 05:41:32PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 06:31:16PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > [...]
> > Fixes: 0b3e336601b82c6a ("arm64: Add support for STACKLEAK gcc plugin")
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > Cc: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> 
> I thought this was queued already but I couldn't find it in -next. So:
> 
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Should this patch go via the arm64 tree for -rc6, or should I just carry
it as part of the overall stackleak series?

-- 
Kees Cook