Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 07:05:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 07:05:12 -0500 Received: from [195.66.192.167] ([195.66.192.167]:51468 "EHLO Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 07:05:08 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: vda To: Pete Zaitcev Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk loglevel cleanup (again) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:01:27 -0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200111271758.fARHwmO22631@devserv.devel.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <200111271758.fARHwmO22631@devserv.devel.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01112814012701.00944@manta> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 27 November 2001 15:58, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > Linus refused wholesale cleanups in the past. Try to identify > worst offenders and start from those, and work through component > maintainers. It's a lot more work, but you have to tough it out. This patch can be split into individual patches right at any hunk boundary. I think any interested maintainer can take it and apply relevant parts (or as a whole, since their diffs for Linus are most probaly made only from relevant kernel subtrees (they won't propagate unwanted modifications)) Anyway, it's only printks. -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/