Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760816AbXEJLiT (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2007 07:38:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755860AbXEJLiH (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2007 07:38:07 -0400 Received: from [209.180.55.243] ([209.180.55.243]:51007 "EHLO jdub.homelinux.org" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754558AbXEJLiG (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2007 07:38:06 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 1773 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Thu, 10 May 2007 07:38:06 EDT Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add hard_irq_disable() From: Josh Boyer To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: David Miller , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1178789346.5575.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20070510003528.395b122b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1178786505.14928.225.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070510015036.ebded3ac.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070510.015328.104645983.davem@davemloft.net> <1178789346.5575.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 06:01:03 -0500 Message-Id: <1178794863.11271.20.camel@vader.jdub.homelinux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 (2.10.1-4.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1503 Lines: 52 On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 19:29 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 01:53 -0700, David Miller wrote: > > From: Andrew Morton > > Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 01:50:36 -0700 > > > > > We discussed this a couple of months back. davem landed firmly in the > > > second camp and everyone then shut up ;) > > > > No I landed in the first :-))) > > > > I think the empty lines are a waste and only serve to eat > > up precious screen real-estate when reading code. > > > > It is possible that I used to use the empty line thing in > > the past, but I definitely don't do that any more. > > Yup, I used to do the other one too but nowadays, I much prefer not > wasting that additional line unless specific circumstances, like I > want a kind of "title" in front of a whole block of other definitions > with their own comments. > > Something like: > > > /* > * foo management stuff > */ > > > /* This puts the bar in the foo > */ > code code code code > > /* This does something you don't want to know about > */ > code code code code Now your examples are just wrong. One liners should be: /* This puts the bar in the foo */ Are we having fun yet? ;) /me goes to look for something better to do josh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/