Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
From:   Jason Wang <wangborong@cdjrlc.com>
To:     davem@davemloft.net
Cc:     wangborong@cdjrlc.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] sparc32: srmmu: Fix typo in a comment
Date:   Sun,  8 May 2022 10:43:51 +0800
Message-Id: <20220508024351.110391-1-wangborong@cdjrlc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Feedback-ID: bizesmtp:cdjrlc.com:qybgspam:qybgspam10
Precedence: bulk

The double `hush' in the comment in line 1186 is repeated. Remove one
of them from the comment.

Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <wangborong@cdjrlc.com>
---
 arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c b/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c
index a9aa6a92c7fe..da6fd141662b 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c
@@ -1183,7 +1183,7 @@ static void __init init_swift(void)
 		srmmu_modtype = Swift_lots_o_bugs;
 		hwbug_bitmask |= (HWBUG_KERN_ACCBROKEN | HWBUG_KERN_CBITBROKEN);
 		/*
-		 * Gee george, I wonder why Sun is so hush hush about
+		 * Gee george, I wonder why Sun is so hush about
 		 * this hardware bug... really braindamage stuff going
 		 * on here.  However I think we can find a way to avoid
 		 * all of the workaround overhead under Linux.  Basically,
-- 
2.35.1