From: Christian <christiand59@web.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v11
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 18:59:11 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6
References: <20070508150431.GA26977@elte.hu>
In-Reply-To: <20070508150431.GA26977@elte.hu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200705101859.11696.christiand59@web.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 956
Lines: 22

Hello lkml, hello Ingo!

I've been using CFS-v10 for a few days and I must say that I'm verry 
impressed ;-)

Desktop performance without any manual renicing is excellent, even with 
make -j20. Gaming performance is at least on par with SD now! I've tried to 
change the sched_load_smoothing config to "8" but there is no visible 
difference when it's set to "7".

Both schedulers are verrry good! I can't really tell which one is better.
I noticed that while compiling a kernel (with -j4) my CPU temperature is two 
to three degrees hotter than with mainline. I have not done any timing tests, 
but I suspect that it's a little faster while preserving excellent desktop 
usability. Great work!! :-)

-Christian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/