Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>,
        x86@kernel.org
Cc:     Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
        Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
        Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
        "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
        Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@intel.com>,
        iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 15/29] x86/hpet: Add helper function
 hpet_set_comparator_periodic()
In-Reply-To: <87mtfufifa.ffs@tglx>
References: <20220506000008.30892-1-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
 <20220506000008.30892-16-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
 <87mtfufifa.ffs@tglx>
Date:   Fri, 06 May 2022 23:51:52 +0200
Message-ID: <87ilqifhxj.ffs@tglx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, May 06 2022 at 23:41, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, May 05 2022 at 16:59, Ricardo Neri wrote:
>> Programming an HPET channel as periodic requires setting the
>> HPET_TN_SETVAL bit in the channel configuration. Plus, the comparator
>> register must be written twice (once for the comparator value and once for
>> the periodic value). Since this programming might be needed in several
>> places (e.g., the HPET clocksource and the HPET-based hardlockup detector),
>> add a helper function for this purpose.
>>
>> A helper function hpet_set_comparator_oneshot() could also be implemented.
>> However, such function would only program the comparator register and the
>> function would be quite small. Hence, it is better to not bloat the code
>> with such an obvious function.
>
> This word salad above does not provide a single reason why the periodic
> programming function is required and better suited for the NMI watchdog
> case and then goes on and blurbs about why a function which is not
> required is not implemented. The argument about not bloating the code
> with an "obvious???" function which is quite small is slightly beyond my
> comprehension level.

What's even more uncomprehensible is that the patch which actually sets
up that NMI watchdog cruft has:

> +       if (hc->boot_cfg & HPET_TN_PERIODIC_CAP)
> +               hld_data->has_periodic = true;

So how the heck does that work with a HPET which does not support
periodic mode?

That watchdog muck will still happily invoke that set periodic function
in the hope that it works by chance?

Thanks,

        tglx