Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Thu, 5 May 2022 17:34:11 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To:     Qin Jian <qinjian@cqplus1.com>
Cc:     krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: sunplus: Add bindings for Sunplus
 SP7021 SoC boards
Message-ID: <YnRQ4ya2trphqQuo@robh.at.kernel.org>
References: <20220505064430.124657-1-qinjian@cqplus1.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220505064430.124657-1-qinjian@cqplus1.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 02:44:30PM +0800, Qin Jian wrote:
> This introduces bindings for boards based Sunplus SP7021 SoC.
> 
> This patch is separated from the patch series:
> Add Sunplus SP7021 SoC Support. [1]
> To simply thing, I extract it from the original and resend this patch.

This information doesn't belong in the commit msg. You should put 
context like this below the '---'.

Who suggested splitting this out? Normally, new SoC families series are 
applied as a whole by the SoC maintainers (Arnd/Olof).

Rob