Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Mon, 9 May 2022 08:01:04 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        bpf@vger.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 bpf-next 1/5] kallsyms: Fully export
 kallsyms_on_each_symbol function
Message-ID: <20220509060104.GB16939@lst.de>
References: <20220507125711.2022238-1-jolsa@kernel.org> <20220507125711.2022238-2-jolsa@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20220507125711.2022238-2-jolsa@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Precedence: bulk

I'm not sure how I'm supposed to review just a patch 1 out of 5
without the rest.

What I can ѕay without the rest is that the subject line is wrong
as nothing is exported, and that you are adding an overly long line.