Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Sun, 8 May 2022 19:09:45 +0800
From:   Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
To:     Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     akpm@linux-foundation.org, mike.kravetz@oracle.com,
        catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
        tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
        deller@gmx.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
        paulus@samba.org, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
        agordeev@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com,
        svens@linux.ibm.com, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, dalias@libc.org,
        davem@davemloft.net, arnd@arndb.de,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
        sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mm: change huge_ptep_clear_flush() to return the
 original pte
Message-ID: <Ynek+b3k6PVN3x7J@FVFYT0MHHV2J.usts.net>
References: <cover.1652002221.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
 <012a484019e7ad77c39deab0af52a6755d8438c8.1652002221.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <012a484019e7ad77c39deab0af52a6755d8438c8.1652002221.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 05:36:39PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> It is incorrect to use ptep_clear_flush() to nuke a hugetlb page
> table when unmapping or migrating a hugetlb page, and will change
> to use huge_ptep_clear_flush() instead in the following patches.
> 
> So this is a preparation patch, which changes the huge_ptep_clear_flush()
> to return the original pte to help to nuke a hugetlb page table.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
> Acked-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>

Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>

But one nit below:

[...]
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 8605d7e..61a21af 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -5342,7 +5342,7 @@ static vm_fault_t hugetlb_wp(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  		ClearHPageRestoreReserve(new_page);
>  
>  		/* Break COW or unshare */
> -		huge_ptep_clear_flush(vma, haddr, ptep);
> +		(void)huge_ptep_clear_flush(vma, haddr, ptep);

Why add a "(void)" here? Is there any warning if no "(void)"?
IIUC, I think we can remove this, right?

>  		mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(mm, range.start, range.end);
>  		page_remove_rmap(old_page, vma, true);
>  		hugepage_add_new_anon_rmap(new_page, vma, haddr);
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 
>