Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Wed, 4 May 2022 20:55:39 +0100
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        alex.popov@linux.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        luto@kernel.org, will@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] arm64: stackleak: fix current_top_of_stack()
Message-ID: <YnLaOw49WTbhmflw@arm.com>
References: <20220427173128.2603085-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>
 <20220427173128.2603085-2-mark.rutland@arm.com>
 <YnKsvNtIlE6cZEOa@arm.com>
 <202205041200.147A737@keescook>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <202205041200.147A737@keescook>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 12:01:11PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 05:41:32PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 06:31:16PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > Fixes: 0b3e336601b82c6a ("arm64: Add support for STACKLEAK gcc plugin")
> > > Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > > Cc: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
> > > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > > Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > > Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > > Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> > 
> > I thought this was queued already but I couldn't find it in -next. So:
> > 
> > Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> 
> Should this patch go via the arm64 tree for -rc6, or should I just carry
> it as part of the overall stackleak series?

I'll leave this up to Will (we take turns in managing the kernel
releases) but it doesn't look urgent at all to me since it fixes a
commit in 4.19.

-- 
Catalin