Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Mon, 9 May 2022 11:05:17 -0400
From:   =?utf-8?B?TsOtY29sYXMgRi4gUi4gQS4=?= Prado 
        <nfraprado@collabora.com>
To:     Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@google.com>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>, kernel@collabora.com,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Make l1tcm reg
 exclusive to mt819x
Message-ID: <20220509150517.ij5lev2mlcem2epx@notapiano>
References: <20220506213226.257859-1-nfraprado@collabora.com>
 <20220506213226.257859-2-nfraprado@collabora.com>
 <CA+Px+wXQjys8xvTSSJkLXoGp4yQnANbKWBtfuxiYi0UX6DH0jw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CA+Px+wXQjys8xvTSSJkLXoGp4yQnANbKWBtfuxiYi0UX6DH0jw@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 10:27:18AM +0800, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
> On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 5:32 AM N?colas F. R. A. Prado
> <nfraprado@collabora.com> wrote:
> > +  - if:
> > +      properties:
> > +        compatible:
> > +          enum:
> > +            - mediatek,mt8192-scp
> > +            - mediatek,mt8195-scp
> > +    then:
> > +      properties:
> > +        reg:
> > +          minItems: 3
> > +          maxItems: 3
> > +        reg-names:
> > +          items:
> > +            - const: sram
> > +            - const: cfg
> > +            - const: l1tcm
> 
> "l1tcm" should be optional.  Does it make more sense by using "minItems: 2"?

Hi Tzung-Bi,

thank you for the information. I did notice from the driver code that l1tcm was
treated as optional for mt8192, but since I wasn't sure if that was intended, I
kept it as required for the mt8192/mt8195 binding, since making it optional
later wouldn't break the ABI, but the opposite would.

But yes, since it is indeed optional for those platforms, I will lower minItems
to 2 for them in the next version.

Thanks,
N?colas