Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Tue, 10 May 2022 01:20:01 +0530
From:   Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To:     Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Cc:     Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Remove unused parameter from
 find_kfunc_desc_btf()
Message-ID: <20220509195001.vrfexsqty6igbh2r@apollo.legion>
References: <20220505070114.3522522-1-ytcoode@gmail.com>
 <20220509175242.3zgihomxteagixfa@kafai-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220509175242.3zgihomxteagixfa@kafai-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 11:22:42PM IST, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 03:01:14PM +0800, Yuntao Wang wrote:
> > The func_id parameter in find_kfunc_desc_btf() is not used, get rid of it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com>
> Although it is a bpf-next material, it is still useful to have a Fixes tag
> such that the reviewer can quickly understand how the current code got here.
>
> Fixes: 2357672c54c3 ("bpf: Introduce BPF support for kernel module function calls")
> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>

Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>

--
Kartikeya