Received: by 2002:a6b:500f:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e15csp5552590iob; Mon, 9 May 2022 20:27:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxb4WyWDwCHPxfThXo3XbxBCrD0FkKG0sNEufcLWtP6B6D7et/JpZ4zhQJMszkMX/3j2Y29 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:99c1:b0:6ef:d995:11ac with SMTP id s1-20020a17090699c100b006efd99511acmr16816841ejn.244.1652153220222; Mon, 09 May 2022 20:27:00 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1652153220; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FaBUCPA8X9JzBV/+fqiQWflZ/+dS6Jyppf6cvqxmZ9KlvDSCwI7438TGveDg0B8o0b 96PsmFFBM0rGLJxYJWqjsEvAsmIVsQd8W3AGS6A/w6Kb3zyB2QxSzlYPqn1zLwNGSwMB oO0JpivG04e/2rbkmhQthkjOHpXjb3+f88RrrjZr3b/7R66JnX9bChs2un2JN7Jy0KO3 brLr9NaVsKX4msXX+LkHNle2hlWopw9bFmel6iEUCzIUkDWeAtUAqLgawfoCq+dXsLle AKuPzszk8+2pm5P76h/D3OG29y9WofwvcwURMivCOdg0UWeG9KYiHfdAuNMwBaFBmpUd 1iIA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=y0LHyDV/QtfKHEclGsVRlXVKx+4HpOXEkRqaQ/EbP68=; b=vulObN+6KDlP0krTuSym2nUgJ6JPkkXhJzLzG6HmPBfTtduPXAJ+H5p+W9JTOAqyjx wvF4lFPbB1T0euqV6H/Pc0iwTiQzZTp8rqrvQbJkh9NTHdJpW/aY8Cc1N/TV4aIYvKtO UDTNPskOzAkPT2nYpY457ntzgjg10j5uTPEfeoSSPNQhPBFW1lHPuMyEAgZYuGkVxOBf /czKMqnyDr4vKV5ONXoCd5Cqotol3unudG3DQ4Ye/4e2Fte0ZofB4OfTk9H8je1vnFRi ppvobVmxFIJaUghUX1iEYeFdyRl4lPBUcTXpd9rjiQU2bScoif5hyjA5w3HS0+SOkauM WTSg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hv13-20020a17090760cd00b006df76385e8fsi8296239ejc.815.2022.05.09.20.26.36; Mon, 09 May 2022 20:26:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233119AbiEJCkY (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 9 May 2022 22:40:24 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40240 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234844AbiEJCkQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2022 22:40:16 -0400 Received: from SHSQR01.spreadtrum.com (mx1.unisoc.com [222.66.158.135]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2341224BD7; Mon, 9 May 2022 19:36:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SHSend.spreadtrum.com (shmbx04.spreadtrum.com [10.0.1.214]) by SHSQR01.spreadtrum.com with ESMTPS id 24A2ZHmq016228 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 10 May 2022 10:35:17 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from Jing.Xia@unisoc.com) Received: from bj08259pcu.spreadtrum.com (10.0.74.59) by shmbx04.spreadtrum.com (10.0.1.214) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23; Tue, 10 May 2022 10:35:17 +0800 From: Jing Xia To: CC: , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH V2] writeback: Avoid skipping inode writeback Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 10:35:14 +0800 Message-ID: <20220510023514.27399-1-jing.xia@unisoc.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.0.74.59] X-ClientProxiedBy: SHCAS03.spreadtrum.com (10.0.1.207) To shmbx04.spreadtrum.com (10.0.1.214) X-MAIL: SHSQR01.spreadtrum.com 24A2ZHmq016228 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org We have run into an issue that a task gets stuck in balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited() when perform I/O stress testing. The reason we observed is that an I_DIRTY_PAGES inode with lots of dirty pages is in b_dirty_time list and standard background writeback cannot writeback the inode. After studing the relevant code, the following scenario may lead to the issue: task1 task2 ----- ----- fuse_flush write_inode_now //in b_dirty_time writeback_single_inode __writeback_single_inode fuse_write_end filemap_dirty_folio __xa_set_mark:PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY lock inode->i_lock if mapping tagged PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES unlock inode->i_lock __mark_inode_dirty:I_DIRTY_PAGES lock inode->i_lock -was dirty,inode stays in -b_dirty_time unlock inode->i_lock if(!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_All)) -not true,so nothing done This patch moves the dirty inode to b_dirty list when the inode currently is not queued in b_io or b_more_io list at the end of writeback_single_inode. Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 0ae45f63d4ef ("vfs: add support for a lazytime mount option") Signed-off-by: Jing Xia --- fs/fs-writeback.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c index 591fe9cf1659..1fae0196292a 100644 --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c @@ -1712,6 +1712,10 @@ static int writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, */ if (!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_ALL)) inode_cgwb_move_to_attached(inode, wb); + else if (!(inode->i_state & I_SYNC_QUEUED) && + (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY)) + redirty_tail_locked(inode, wb); + spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock); inode_sync_complete(inode); out: -- 2.17.1