Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220507052451.12890-19-ojeda@kernel.org> <7e9c2e77-8b70-6e15-3f3d-905ab42b0fcd@gmail.com>
 <CANiq72mBVo4+htxVjY0wB1Y3GO2PEUiZjZKRYT8ddwx84-hAtg@mail.gmail.com>
 <92a7010c-5bb2-65df-edde-0ca88e035c2e@gmail.com> <8735hicoy7.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
In-Reply-To: <8735hicoy7.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 May 2022 13:57:40 +0200
Message-ID: <CANiq72mna9MKSgJYs19k=ieYu4v4TuemLdp1wkyhr9hqJ-tuAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 18/23] docs: add Rust documentation
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc:     Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
        Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
        Adam Bratschi-Kaye <ark.email@gmail.com>,
        Boris-Chengbiao Zhou <bobo1239@web.de>,
        Wu XiangCheng <bobwxc@email.cn>, Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>,
        Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
        Yuki Okushi <jtitor@2k36.org>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
        Julian Merkle <me@jvmerkle.de>, Finn Behrens <me@kloenk.de>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        rust-for-linux <rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>,
        Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@gmail.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@google.com>,
        Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:37 AM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
>
> Yeah, but the issues are all with me :)  Please accept my apologies for
> letting it slip through the cracks.

No apologies needed! It is not an important patch -- I just thought it
would be better to have the "base logo" merged before the "derived
one".

> Looking at it now, though, I hesitate to add the logo (and another
> COPYING file) in the top-level Documentation directory - I'd really
> rather people not have to pick through a bunch of unrelated stuff to
> find the actual docs they want.  I'd recommend we make a
> Documentation/images (or .../assets or whatever) and put things like
> logos there.

Yeah, makes sense to avoid dumping things in the top-level directory.

> Disagree?  If not, could I get a version of the patch that does that?  I
> promise not to set on it for three months this time...

+1, I will send it.

Thanks Jon!

Cheers,
Miguel