Received: by 2002:a6b:500f:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e15csp6342734iob; Tue, 10 May 2022 16:32:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxo1DhYfPQvPD5ZkVodd7/Y7o9OKdvAvpIGAGmZx67SLUBxYDXhTMOXjRLVyr/UdUXXLXy1 X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3a86:b0:1dc:228f:6a1f with SMTP id om6-20020a17090b3a8600b001dc228f6a1fmr2249961pjb.230.1652225530936; Tue, 10 May 2022 16:32:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1652225530; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lwPc0BruqS9sWLBEeWm9rAy0AqsUaxz0hMAoOtBgtrXinpMBd5tsiP6mC99Okv2/Vy tkzL6B/gw2Dc2KwIB0P0Av3kFoMVt2KbOTVaJ6v2ZHvcFqv2i6uneT4bSoIlRvUyPCRj 1W/Z6zn+C7MjHs3UUzwSbi+j1E2jGSHw9Sr1xmn8cb43O3qXgcrhYZgvvztIShppSi7E fJfz9/mXlz1oqUVZ+94ncALMDDZHaq6ugIfRIJrCk7YnB/SFpnTpCyva1ulxX6NsdfG5 sfl5Sqm63d714ijMz1StRVZxs6PH4VU3oblymIwZoTkRIpNEioNBcY86gcnEDUNvU98h CbSA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=4xY5bF9UYm6MAVtzgNfATpmkNYNH44rnKMWoXQzjxrI=; b=fdzLCTobS1/OAexQ7wPwjR1QWaauC/kuX/ltv5eXzOZZU2luCY7lUn8ZYWbA78dvku BQAZVfnmHXQizAVKdVoPzBfS/h5bNGlAWP9WS1B6ZyH1lZXnjFJzMbNYjjHHwsB89eww zbpe8P2vGOBgbVUZJiV/6Cwwxib+tOQo/I9F/eHpoDSIqyO4hIEBm7l50h8iQ9bGjWeo VOOLKbpjs5mur1Fj6FFMAilp+Ec2UgM/GEbeMW0j5GaBCvx7uUe7+GI3NIep43pbNCMP qMjWocQr9cW0PAfsUo4FbZFm7PLvm2hkhSOW+nEkP/8I3AoQH7RbYJ67jkvkBI2JiMVV +F/Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=FItJqMaN; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z21-20020a637e15000000b003c1dc83e6b6si815554pgc.317.2022.05.10.16.31.56; Tue, 10 May 2022 16:32:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=FItJqMaN; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229690AbiEJWwU (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 10 May 2022 18:52:20 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45806 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232301AbiEJWwS (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2022 18:52:18 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x433.google.com (mail-pf1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::433]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52EA36C0C5 for ; Tue, 10 May 2022 15:52:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x433.google.com with SMTP id bo5so411893pfb.4 for ; Tue, 10 May 2022 15:52:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4xY5bF9UYm6MAVtzgNfATpmkNYNH44rnKMWoXQzjxrI=; b=FItJqMaNmWv33SShK+ZO3am8AWGCUIO6YZHO6V6G0rTg06JmT35pvYET0rD5wPSRKz PgAkOYcRvOg9plTi0Fpz6xMt09s+1bmZfMjbmpygVANoPcqVB3lrBOHQIGZKzyRQC2cz DERZv562zIwz3Y/CWl4EbJM59XeNRgMvRXdDxJ6wv3iRRZ0LV6Sxz60uF4f3G6yS4Jn+ w45yjweNbsXo+XV4w/ghyJ+0ddsElP9+zEKMZyU97FyjBDsuZNWSuv+JBECRCBsFfFUP KnAri+dIhCAJdvlBSpRF1utp2WaUQN1LqnKN/58bGKpNR11aN2B1+2gLa7jOQ5itTpzd XzXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4xY5bF9UYm6MAVtzgNfATpmkNYNH44rnKMWoXQzjxrI=; b=vNCduuXQNn0Nc8LT7BZKIzm1qP2dASXHSxL/dK6W26ROCThxMmcvDFaKv5N1OrHgNx NzXJrRKPAUy89GWOZgHe7IA4f7HRANqX0Mz6RnMF9jwsOpG2PW7Ps82YohbICVBN6nhS 8QVelSiXpL4mpb7/cR2rSW12IGdrsfLerDL7xR3fKImlUGUfmzbkFtHY4Mylr1c8u4wM kzfju5G/VKC8Bkqf6SfX6LBLaZ35RSJuy301GJvsrtcbqadxucMtYVIschmXAkehm1sM tfXO66vvvK0xQBX1t+vtmLcdcjcTVkYi9yLYqgwT/6ddTDHKco15fiALcMdJ+4Mzb3Ty WdbA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532mu4TC7O/ufcgZ8rtEclutXpOqwRgmTVly8DmBJ5tXPt3XUwSr +bn9FP5d89BDeBDZq0FsRF7VTA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1251:b0:50d:f2c2:7f4e with SMTP id u17-20020a056a00125100b0050df2c27f4emr22492045pfi.72.1652223136854; Tue, 10 May 2022 15:52:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.254.17] ([50.39.160.154]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p2-20020a1709027ec200b0015e8d4eb229sm149967plb.115.2022.05.10.15.52.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 May 2022 15:52:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 15:52:15 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] exfat: check if cluster num is valid Content-Language: en-US To: Namjae Jeon Cc: Sungjong Seo , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzbot+a4087e40b9c13aad7892@syzkaller.appspotmail.com References: <20220418173923.193173-1-tadeusz.struk@linaro.org> From: Tadeusz Struk In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/29/22 20:26, Namjae Jeon wrote: >> Could you please share how to reproduce this ? > Ping, If you apply this patch to your source, there is a problem. You > need to add +1 to EXFAT_DATA_CLUSTER_COUNT(sbi). > and please use is_valid_cluster() to check if cluster is valid instead of it. Ok, I will try a new version with is_valid_cluster() -- Thanks, Tadeusz