Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 11 May 2022 13:37:53 +0100
From:   Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To:     Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@gmail.com>
Cc:     Dominic Rath <dominic.rath@ibv-augsburg.net>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Tom Joseph <tjoseph@cadence.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= <kw@linux.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: cadence: respond to received PTM Requests
Message-ID: <YnuuIQgwt45zUEcR@lpieralisi>
References: <20220429105627.GA28438@lpieralisi>
 <20220429192825.GA82239@bhelgaas>
 <20220505144347.GA19346@JADEVM-DRA>
 <CAH9NwWcU71gZ2woZ7ePRvuwz=_T+F7V6VOYLyAqPhTy1j6xxPA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAH9NwWcU71gZ2woZ7ePRvuwz=_T+F7V6VOYLyAqPhTy1j6xxPA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 04:48:17PM +0200, Christian Gmeiner wrote:

[...]

> > > I think the proposed subject of "Enable Controller to respond to
> > > received PTM Requests" is somewhat misleading, though, because PTM
> > > responses still aren't enabled until we set PTM Enable.  I suggest
> > > something like:
> > >
> > >   PCI: cadence: Allow PTM Responder to be enabled
> >
> > I'll ask Christian for permission to resend his patch with the subject
> > changed.
> >
> 
> I will send a new version tomorrow with an improved subject line.

Hi Christian,

just asking if you are about to post a new version to pick it up.

Thanks,
Lorenzo