Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 11 May 2022 22:07:36 -0400
From:   "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To:     Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
        KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        mie@igel.co.jp
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] virtio: last minute fixup
Message-ID: <Ynxr6JNczWFTwxVw@mit.edu>
References: <20220510082351-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
 <CAHk-=wjPR+bj7P1O=MAQWXp0Mx2hHuNQ1acn6gS+mRo_kbo5Lg@mail.gmail.com>
 <YnrxTMVRtDnGA/EK@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
 <CAHk-=wgAk3NEJ2PHtb0jXzCUOGytiHLq=rzjkFKfpiuH-SROgA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20220511125140.ormw47yluv4btiey@meerkat.local>
 <87a6bo89w4.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
 <20220511163116.fpw2lvrkjbxmiesz@meerkat.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220511163116.fpw2lvrkjbxmiesz@meerkat.local>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 12:31:16PM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> > But my mailer, editor and terminal don't know what to do with a Message-Id.
> > 
> > Whereas they can all open an https link.
> > 
> > Making people paste message ids into lore to see the original submission
> > is not a win. People make enough fun of us already for still using email
> > to submit patches, let's not make their job any easier :)
> 
> Okay, I'm fine with using a dedicated trailer for this purpose, perhaps an
> "Archived-At"? That's a real header that was proposed by IETF for similar
> purposes. E.g.:
> 
>     Archived-at: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wgAk3NEJ2PHtb0jXzCUOGytiHLq=rzjkFKfpiuH-SROgA@mail.gmail.com
>

I'd suggest is "Patch-Link".  Then we can also have "Bug-Link:",
"Test-Link:", etc.

"Patch-Link" is a tad bit shorter "Archived-at", and ultimately, it's
not actually not the patch which is being archived.  It's the fact
that it's a pointer to the patch review which is of most interest.

					- Ted