Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 12 May 2022 12:58:09 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc:     Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] cpufreq: Split cpufreq_offline()
Message-ID: <20220512072809.aztba67eummh2amf@vireshk-i7>
References: <5585781.DvuYhMxLoT@kreacher>
 <2258373.ElGaqSPkdT@kreacher>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2258373.ElGaqSPkdT@kreacher>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52
Precedence: bulk

On 11-05-22, 17:50, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> Split the "core" part running under the policy rwsem out of
> cpufreq_offline() to allow the locking in cpufreq_remove_dev() to be
> rearranged more easily.
> 
> As a side-effect this eliminates the unlock label that's not needed
> any more.
> 
> No expected functional impact.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c |   33 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh