Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220511072747.3960-1-jiangshanlai@gmail.com> <20220511072747.3960-2-jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
 <CAKwvOdmF_5KudQbC8j5hJT1CqxvYtMneZxb1Si3A2uNxopk3yQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKwvOdmF_5KudQbC8j5hJT1CqxvYtMneZxb1Si3A2uNxopk3yQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 May 2022 21:27:32 +0200
Message-ID: <CANiq72kc02DbgVdKusDUeCkxVoQoOGMLnEJnzf-Gn=BiQUggLw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] x86/entry: Introduce __entry_text for entry code
 written in C
To:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc:     Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@kernel.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Marco Elver <elver@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 8:01 PM Nick Desaulniers
<ndesaulniers@google.com> wrote:
>
> I haven't looked at the rest of the series, but isn't `noinstr` used
> in a bunch of places? Wont this commit break all those uses or at

Except the order, it expands to the same, no? Or what is the issue?

Cheers,
Miguel