Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
        linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/5] Documentation: gpio: Fix IRQ mask and unmask examples
Date:   Thu, 12 May 2022 20:39:17 +0300
Message-Id: <20220512173921.8210-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

After switching to immutable IRQ chips for GPIO drivers the examples become
uncompilable due to wrong IRQ API, i.e. irq_desc_get_handler_data() in use.
Replace it with proper irq_data_get_irq_chip_data() call where it applies.

Fixes: 5644b66a9c63 ("Documentation: Update the recommended pattern for GPIO irqchips")
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
 Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst
index a1ddefa1f55f..964d09118d17 100644
--- a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst
+++ b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst
@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ call into the core gpiolib code:
 
   static void my_gpio_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
   {
-      struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(d);
+      struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
 
       /*
        * Perform any necessary action to mask the interrupt,
@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ call into the core gpiolib code:
 
   static void my_gpio_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
   {
-      struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(d);
+      struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
 
       gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, d->hwirq);
 
@@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ the interrupt separately and go with it:
 
   static void my_gpio_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
   {
-      struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(d);
+      struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
 
       /*
        * Perform any necessary action to mask the interrupt,
@@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ the interrupt separately and go with it:
 
   static void my_gpio_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
   {
-      struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(d);
+      struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
 
       gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, d->hwirq);
 
@@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ In this case the typical set-up will look like this:
 
   static void my_gpio_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
   {
-      struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(d);
+      struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
 
       /*
        * Perform any necessary action to mask the interrupt,
@@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ In this case the typical set-up will look like this:
 
   static void my_gpio_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
   {
-      struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(d);
+      struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
 
       gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, d->hwirq);
 
-- 
2.35.1