Received: by 2002:a6b:500f:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e15csp774675iob; Fri, 13 May 2022 12:16:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyiZ3qbGQyVf5BwF9Y+2U6+/mGSOPebdMDu6KoKFi2IornwOrfRYVUpJLHkhh6KyPs1DkNQ X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1293:b0:394:3940:2302 with SMTP id t19-20020a05600c129300b0039439402302mr5851674wmd.121.1652469405156; Fri, 13 May 2022 12:16:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1652469405; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=hO+64br0zjLAb0/TL+DFp+/NtpH5en/KBH8a9XTaRfrJiXKpTo23jLiJ04x2Ps30YF uHKZKBzNb3D0RstWb0wuph+u6RVumyjCuWvS2kjrZlJgon/P1gjEoiU35Cvl8BXARSnN WUg/NxY8K4RS0YiFxYsbcIFL6oooE/0+PMnX0ms7f4MNw3mrPHsBXQWcNE1/ov/tbjZf zWJCrya8h2P574Gwu/F78sEI+lHJuctMI/2frNYUE4tdS/BTSuR8Gk+5PWcAlPyI392N B2DMo1x4EWZdlVCXtLqtNEj3HSFZMOf2jBAErqFVLUVCBmmgFjd2wAZkrKdgu4z1PMUz iDMA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=8x6aPJt6yqRe+xxwaduylXqRn+TAS3mKV8QmNRMu74M=; b=rxgDOuhv8KHMBbySpnVVuzmjW/3yzZPLADmorwQAJCo017jBLNzuIhVj0HPd12HZfm Rrv7CqgbGhBk1ifkznyA56ChbCKyrjWPO3trxV1e43qVeCceeI1Qe0MEeL66++a0ENdo tOZc/cTyhF3WmgoSBGUYP8ytztIRaC5paHlg74N/iJLMoYGBHlVkNlofRn+mBPodwGID S/dyp9fyhSDMyzPo6nL29HAibtK4XIG6ZqYJVrZIMUcyZ9iLSewANkyp24hk11MwxKeB HStXhqvwfNf00qQMVst8PomUOJV5ZQJCL0/hJbX6XNYehUhHTjDgy6eF9kJqW7YWYgKU xyVQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.com header.s=susede1 header.b=oqAeYgjo; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=suse.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bk13-20020a0560001d8d00b0020aa329aa15si2512920wrb.944.2022.05.13.12.16.14; Fri, 13 May 2022 12:16:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.com header.s=susede1 header.b=oqAeYgjo; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=suse.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1356799AbiELREQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 12 May 2022 13:04:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39216 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242193AbiELREO (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2022 13:04:14 -0400 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D57016D4DA; Thu, 12 May 2022 10:04:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EEC71F8EF; Thu, 12 May 2022 17:04:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1652375052; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8x6aPJt6yqRe+xxwaduylXqRn+TAS3mKV8QmNRMu74M=; b=oqAeYgjoS/Yzrg0FlOaRvqUONZMeshLiVKHa5kE0tg7n3W/Qd8TjfD2+9mXN1PtCJP58R8 wnlHvNSmzK+5ejL8Fn0anZd7UdrYBDHqSDVzVTUq6+y9ZXzNhqW3be11YgM8I/tx3NwAfM R0sJIrUtOa7NJDVEeM6pKGJS33DF4rc= Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 453DB13ABE; Thu, 12 May 2022 17:04:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id 0BnrDww+fWIuHAAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Thu, 12 May 2022 17:04:12 +0000 Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 19:04:10 +0200 From: Michal =?iso-8859-1?Q?Koutn=FD?= To: David Vernet Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, tj@kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, shakeelb@google.com, kernel-team@fb.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Fix bugs in memcontroller cgroup tests Message-ID: <20220512170410.GA16096@blackbody.suse.cz> References: <20220423155619.3669555-1-void@manifault.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220423155619.3669555-1-void@manifault.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello. On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 08:56:15AM -0700, David Vernet wrote: > tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c contains a set of > testcases which validate expected behavior of the cgroup memory controller. > Roman Gushchin recently sent out a patchset that fixed a few issues in the > test. Link here https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220415000133.3955987-1-roman.gushchin@linux.dev/. > This patchset continues that effort by fixing a few more issues that > were causing non-deterministic failures in the suite. Are the Roman's patches merged anywhere? (I ran into some issues when I was rebasing your (David's) series on top of master.) I'd like to put all sensible patches in one series or stack on existing branch (if there's any). For possible v3 of this series, I did: - dropped the patch that allows non-zero memory.events:low for a sibling with memory.low=0 when mounted with memory_recursiveprot (the case needs more discussion), - added few more cleanups, convenience for debugging, - fixed comments in the first patch. Pushed here [1] before properly sending the v3 for discussion. Thanks, Michal [1] https://github.com/Werkov/linux/commits/cgroup-ml/memory.low-overreclaim-var2