Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1652329411.git.qinjian@cqplus1.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1652329411.git.qinjian@cqplus1.com>
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date:   Fri, 13 May 2022 13:29:51 +0200
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a37G0++hwsxXbMun-r9XKCBvkH3BF4c1f21eFxGPdCdMw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 00/10] Add Sunplus SP7021 SoC Support
To:     Qin Jian <qinjian@cqplus1.com>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 8:30 AM Qin Jian <qinjian@cqplus1.com> wrote:
>
> This patch series add Sunplus SP7021 SoC support.
>
> Sunplus SP7021 is an ARM Cortex A7 (4 cores) based SoC. It integrates many
> peripherals (ex: UART, I2C, SPI, SDIO, eMMC, USB, SD card and etc.) into a
> single chip. It is designed for industrial control.
>
> SP7021 consists of two chips (dies) in a package. One is called C-chip
> (computing chip). It is a 4-core ARM Cortex A7 CPU. It adopts high-level
> process (22 nm) for high performance computing. The other is called P-
> chip (peripheral chip). It has many peripherals and an ARM A926 added
> especially for real-time control. P-chip is made for customers. It adopts
> low-level process (ex: 0.11 um) to reduce cost.

It looks like there are still some remaining review comments, and the clk
driver is missing a review. Since we are close to 5.18-rc7, I think it's
too late for the coming merge window, and you should target 5.20,
with a rebase on top of v5.19-rc1 once that is out.

If you get no replies on the clk driver, maybe try splitting that out and
post it separately to the clk maintainers. I know they are rather
backlogged on review time.

       Arnd