Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Date:   Fri, 13 May 2022 12:07:27 -0700
From:   Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Cc:     Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, patches@lists.linux.dev,
        chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>,
        Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>,
        "Joseph S. Barrera III" <joebar@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: google,cros-ec-keyb: Introduce
 switches only compatible
Message-ID: <Yn6sb1mzXuGyPZeR@google.com>
References: <20220429233112.2851665-2-swboyd@chromium.org>
 <CAD=FV=VX8EEgkeLgKwyKvjztcjbA8UhKOUpTr-sS1_Ec=QcWbA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKdAkRSOtAD6u_cwKhHeMLgz5dC2hfPvVvqmj+17b4i-nspfgg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE-0n50Y8tZD9Djn9TVaAiHxehFJ2cZKZ1Z09piDk47uw3nK+Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <Ynzf5jEIECLmELK7@google.com>
 <CAE-0n50+obQ5qgPNPtUY=OmTgU9bZQ3hNw+MaG9Wi3SQSc-i4A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE-0n52WVNru5fnyaB_7wcBOk4twL0Q92YpRbd40-o6ZBmbXWQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <Yn2YvIFNhaz5GmfI@google.com>
 <CAE-0n52ofANUWOY5h=Jjy5SYv=bnxO3xyN4cm3qGVRYmDtkNBQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE-0n53VqYBP1Pq14ju5GWZ6VcKNS-DwLnM-1J_4Z3HExpMU1g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAE-0n53VqYBP1Pq14ju5GWZ6VcKNS-DwLnM-1J_4Z3HExpMU1g@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 04:53:13PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Stephen Boyd (2022-05-12 16:46:22)
> >
> > I think I covered that in v3 of this series[1].
> 
> Even better, see v4
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220503204212.3907925-1-swboyd@chromium.org/

I guess I was looking for the explicit verbage for when a particular
compatible has or can be used, and I do not believe I see it in either
the 3rd or the 4th version posted. I see some comments in the example
section, but I do not think it is enough.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry