Received: by 2002:a6b:500f:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e15csp1047174iob; Fri, 13 May 2022 21:00:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzUbwTTW3YO77wjri8ytJp/wK2bd14yV40wiEMzKEckCD1/uxM5N3vF4SxPWUygnVntU89s X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6102:0:b0:20a:db89:724f with SMTP id v2-20020a5d6102000000b0020adb89724fmr6215584wrt.59.1652500831637; Fri, 13 May 2022 21:00:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1652500831; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TYn5tuB+QpTmRocXpJcrmYP88zd+b+vHjYiu0Gb23qyEpmdVgSdrDKMHXt2YGpQdQ0 /aYaieVoD7gRuYiFLNkQIy2zl6qHZbRa6agEOel4secHt5ow98KgvqTvhS0yamEyv9j5 IsFmcQ38ZO/SPEfY+fljhN93yTzDnHfxFzfNIzuq1riMffmK9Rv8WtU+wz9wSYpk87SS iRQfg3rbOCuM3HzMcOR/duxh/nz2ihkT/Aue5xJiSH0qmN+4yyisWB+ckVKrQ3zFZ1fP 4FLbfXHKFo4cMHtLolQHrq0LlgGSyxrD8IbqieOWrDnxEwPYjOwyT5o1Rq5Wa0v+LMws AYKA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:sender :dkim-signature; bh=nyw+kIA5BAs/IWrKxn3GKDGPvGzat8nDAzo2DBLLfVQ=; b=dwXPqcF3+Rqrrxfkfg0b11BUoRIkp9Nqur/5G+VxBQyST8GDkb/3U4QMQzOpbrnJCG QTaa79/ONsTOGqDwoc6Ihp+mFrZbl9OBOyl5k0stughdmuVq23s1sUuGpXUD6tsHR6u1 jNvXSYsrEuiLDpbV3CQoJMoZSIqVRfFk6hQZgwVdO8JOwXjc1Qn+YjexZU44/Wz2abZx Z1UjmkmN8pdAWIj3CjMzYqI951UVlMFCJb/9PbLhUVG9h6PhO3AET9l14M21U55py3oR V0jgUFThGZMxcUYaKS1asEngd+SUp1HqKIe3dwjG2Ut1jpWokl1CaTFsYAUiW+P8Z9Eu g07Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=lHrCVIXE; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net. [23.128.96.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i187-20020a1c3bc4000000b0039481f8f0bbsi3978310wma.87.2022.05.13.21.00.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 13 May 2022 21:00:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=lHrCVIXE; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B436A4A16C9; Fri, 13 May 2022 17:31:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1349885AbiELBUm (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 11 May 2022 21:20:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36866 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1349867AbiELBUf (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 May 2022 21:20:35 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x431.google.com (mail-pf1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::431]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3FBEA0D2C for ; Wed, 11 May 2022 18:20:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x431.google.com with SMTP id v11so3437541pff.6 for ; Wed, 11 May 2022 18:20:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nyw+kIA5BAs/IWrKxn3GKDGPvGzat8nDAzo2DBLLfVQ=; b=lHrCVIXEYfUGh2winYDW1cmqYJce8Z3fVZKUfdoVJjk/fENnqbBsd06otQQh2BzoEp jG9/5U9ce4aSF/nROlXRisuVJtHiSJIklOzJdtExiZHtZl89BAoAmA1KiSIGoyDuI9YR nC+DLRD2lxRH7wWEgwX5eLBmYutZglDCPmzzcpDhZFSEyWJol86n7lCbsSXfeobkHKsD vC8iQq7uPL0TmLwxFnOgStCuLWMh3thZUdNdgRUFm+MvzzlrXeaTTElvkS5huBShjNLI S1ZdXNHDDL0KJKe+O9FSgrAIspumtYpNCjhzhyHDKYrTh/0szm8QKKYBgJN2TUflyGiS LICQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nyw+kIA5BAs/IWrKxn3GKDGPvGzat8nDAzo2DBLLfVQ=; b=7NIa9fYk6YnYkUa8j/WHslsHlyRGGTgVeqlMWH5A8JquRmWuy7+wZCEnqQgqSNvkYi CgbxyriB9WulwStamgt4G7c45OGLi3CcDRe/bjBosCt4J4tLLFFEKxpBqKqKEJbkzHrY /NvmSkoShXWlb8cYjniFPaU1ArbCY23/QNi07oJIsSDRD1p+NUpe4wv21Cu0w1QBM4xX wNCD1WhmVlVNDHD38ieLELnHFgs/2P8c60KRIh5tStuEF+JDNJIGsMr2CYkZQjhNQYHe H0tKTk20V09JStkasUepwL55Qa2ft2B0tzt+02sjY6i6FkNp/WSL9GF5oG3WTzEdRKPl mWzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53170fNgsFgoDV+kmXxeD3AjO57ug0kZHkPwfknb6n7p3QtjJxRd Jh0W8yPNfRNJkQaoUFFdygU= X-Received: by 2002:a62:a105:0:b0:50d:c97b:3084 with SMTP id b5-20020a62a105000000b0050dc97b3084mr27500292pff.61.1652318424346; Wed, 11 May 2022 18:20:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (124x33x176x97.ap124.ftth.ucom.ne.jp. [124.33.176.97]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x5-20020a170902ea8500b0015e8d4eb24bsm2545978plb.149.2022.05.11.18.20.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 11 May 2022 18:20:24 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Vincent Mailhol From: Vincent Mailhol To: Nick Desaulniers , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov Cc: Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" , Nathan Chancellor , Tom Rix , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev, David Howells , Jan Beulich , Christophe JAILLET , Vincent Mailhol Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] x86/asm/bitops: __ffs,ffz: use __builtin_ctzl to evaluate constant expressions Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 10:18:55 +0900 Message-Id: <20220512011855.1189653-3-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1 In-Reply-To: <20220512011855.1189653-1-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr> References: <20220511160319.1045812-1-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr> <20220512011855.1189653-1-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org __ffs(x) is equivalent to (unsigned long)__builtin_ctzl(x) and ffz(x) is equivalent to (unsigned long)__builtin_ctzl(~x). Because __builting_ctzl() returns an int, a cast to (unsigned long) is necessary to avoid potential warnings on implicit casts. For x86_64, the current __ffs() and ffz() implementations do not produce optimized code when called with a constant expression. On the contrary, the __builtin_ctzl() gets simplified into a single instruction. However, for non constant expressions, the __ffs() and ffz() asm versions of the kernel remains slightly better than the code produced by GCC (it produces a useless instruction to clear eax). This patch uses the __builtin_constant_p() to select between the kernel's __ffs()/ffz() and the __builtin_ctzl() depending on whether the argument is constant or not. ** Statistics ** On a allyesconfig, before applying this patch...: | $ objdump -d vmlinux.o | grep tzcnt | wc -l | 3607 ...and after: | $ objdump -d vmlinux.o | grep tzcnt | wc -l | 2600 So, roughly 27.9% of the calls to either __ffs() or ffz() were using constant expressions and could be optimized out. (tests done on linux v5.18-rc5 x86_64 using GCC 11.2.1) Note: on x86_64, the asm bsf instruction produces tzcnt when used with the ret prefix (which is why we grep tzcnt instead of bsf in above benchmark). c.f. [1] [1] commit e26a44a2d618 ("x86: Use REP BSF unconditionally") http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5058741E020000780009C014@nat28.tlf.novell.com Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers Signed-off-by: Vincent Mailhol --- arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h index 6ed979547086..f88c55b8b37c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h @@ -224,13 +224,7 @@ static __always_inline bool variable_test_bit(long nr, volatile const unsigned l ? constant_test_bit((nr), (addr)) \ : variable_test_bit((nr), (addr))) -/** - * __ffs - find first set bit in word - * @word: The word to search - * - * Undefined if no bit exists, so code should check against 0 first. - */ -static __always_inline unsigned long __ffs(unsigned long word) +static __always_inline unsigned long variable___ffs(unsigned long word) { asm("rep; bsf %1,%0" : "=r" (word) @@ -238,13 +232,18 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long __ffs(unsigned long word) return word; } -/** - * ffz - find first zero bit in word - * @word: The word to search - * - * Undefined if no zero exists, so code should check against ~0UL first. - */ -static __always_inline unsigned long ffz(unsigned long word) +/** + * __ffs - find first set bit in word + * @word: The word to search + * + * Undefined if no bit exists, so code should check against 0 first. + */ +#define __ffs(word) \ + (__builtin_constant_p(word) ? \ + (unsigned long)__builtin_ctzl(word) : \ + variable___ffs(word)) + +static __always_inline unsigned long variable_ffz(unsigned long word) { asm("rep; bsf %1,%0" : "=r" (word) @@ -252,6 +251,17 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long ffz(unsigned long word) return word; } +/** + * ffz - find first zero bit in word + * @word: The word to search + * + * Undefined if no zero exists, so code should check against ~0UL first. + */ +#define ffz(word) \ + (__builtin_constant_p(word) ? \ + (unsigned long)__builtin_ctzl(~word) : \ + variable_ffz(word)) + /* * __fls: find last set bit in word * @word: The word to search -- 2.35.1