Received: by 2002:a6b:500f:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e15csp1056127iob; Fri, 13 May 2022 21:22:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJweQtiCmWbY6o+ytpM/De5/wlNh07W8UxSbLiLYAdXayKdTNcyQ1IvtVgw3CDCKp2CPU1zy X-Received: by 2002:adf:f6c4:0:b0:20a:cd34:9f68 with SMTP id y4-20020adff6c4000000b0020acd349f68mr6122578wrp.122.1652502171410; Fri, 13 May 2022 21:22:51 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1652502171; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wDpWfOSD+JqwR1Z2lHyxbP11r3RBTiZLAdUfbOFtD7m6Ihz6RIQjbtDIX6XhiWNX1r ItO/c4QV7iz2DspRw2zW4EU2y8lULJ4TARzmN5MqH6CN1FjOD+Km69JVPZfmKavosMqX 4Up+vGD2pFHPSLVJxZ3qYyRf6kRbSC2LxsDX2UfdjlizrKCwTiSR1cfspv5HJfv1zN4c Q717ptzNkxzhKaHdLmCQvkQp9uEUoWNvy+yUdWJc34/LAD7pzZxNVsp4qeaw5MRgxVjO Eli56vAgPo9LhrE1MNT/W87dc2z8rJcNivEdIPBD20SJIAByPl3pdsLCBOsCMU0lj9jv l8lg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=JNcw6Kup1/LtRwNTwm0RQi5wy62iiEnRYjvOh7wTo3A=; b=fs9qHtaJYnigeUHDTBL1FJhBffvnIqnjPpSWlIvhQ7XiFL2REiy3vlLxnSDbR8n5Kn vynAaxiLsF4gzNxuP052FCrBIOQRrnjoD22+FAV4rZ+QL+nCRWIzQN+iY/SvFvKNltdh y4As6aLeytr7lR65iN5wTokT6T9CQDRUJiP7LabcF0pCrIFQDwj3OVYUlhmN3s+u+Ryy tMICovQod3nYPaJMfIQGT9t7R7vS/fFkFDU0L77reQvc3Vpv1LIhZcJl7Xswl7eYjAl1 yZirwGYzXzhGCP2OE8wGq94u3hXXonVD+FpmJkT7ePV4p/na1EjbfErqW0jaF8o5mOt9 8L9A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=Xue7+2qe; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net. [23.128.96.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l6-20020a05600002a600b0020c78292a8asi5197205wry.836.2022.05.13.21.22.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 13 May 2022 21:22:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=Xue7+2qe; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C90A508121; Fri, 13 May 2022 17:52:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229874AbiEMXb5 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 13 May 2022 19:31:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40176 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229485AbiEMXbz (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 May 2022 19:31:55 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BC6530BCFD for ; Fri, 13 May 2022 16:22:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1652484167; x=1684020167; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=KyCPdSxq6CFmcl2pjIuOEIvI0ilyCrZM3eYSgEPizRA=; b=Xue7+2qe/l0+NRfQOz/51GXcktB4EWOCG3KiI/y1l3jHtk0cpF+iW3oH Q3psj6eb74Fuax6hlNYDz7mt4EveTp+TvTb06TlsXDefY63MsUmUsVFy6 l0sXaK5B0v8djl4AQaYtzuo3i2+993/2j6Ez36KRv1rIDHLX1DcU3jn3a /N8mBDx+V0R/r7kXApChYqnSsytezuyeGBNcplV2i/biYGKmCDY47ILFe 50ba7+SKe8tWYLNQXV8yyfxXoG1l4lLEpGkd6f2SH8fY0nd6jijgMHSTI AIS892DUGvjALFyPmvRJrYQCVbFWlxvvFvIrcg+rngluV/APl2uLVRzjB A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10346"; a="268023276" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,223,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="268023276" Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 May 2022 16:22:46 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,223,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="815595889" Received: from black.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.28]) by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 May 2022 16:22:43 -0700 Received: by black.fi.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EBD60A8; Sat, 14 May 2022 02:22:42 +0300 (EEST) Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 02:22:42 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Dave Hansen , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , x86@kernel.org, Andrey Ryabinin , Alexander Potapenko , Dmitry Vyukov , "H . J . Lu" , Andi Kleen , Rick Edgecombe , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFCv2 08/10] x86/mm: Make LAM_U48 and mappings above 47-bits mutually exclusive Message-ID: <20220513232242.7ac7herw7iyfkd2h@black.fi.intel.com> References: <20220511022751.65540-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <20220511022751.65540-10-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <875ymax480.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <875ymax480.ffs@tglx> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 03:36:31PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, May 11 2022 at 05:27, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > LAM_U48 steals bits above 47-bit for tags and makes it impossible for > > userspace to use full address space on 5-level paging machine. > > > Make these features mutually exclusive: whichever gets enabled first > > blocks the othe one. > > So this patch prevents a mapping above 47bit when LAM48 is enabled, but > I fail to spot how an already existing mapping above 47bit would prevent > LAM48 from being enabled. > > Maybe I'm missing something which makes this magically mutually > exclusive. It is in 09/10. See lam_u48_allowed() -- Kirill A. Shutemov