Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sat, 14 May 2022 14:58:08 +0100 (BST)
From:   "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>
To:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Documentation: Wire Oxford Semiconductor PCIe
 (Tornado) 950
In-Reply-To: <c6f4a479-6689-1ce6-60fb-c24f2635ad28@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2205141454350.10656@angie.orcam.me.uk>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2205131712410.10656@angie.orcam.me.uk> <alpine.DEB.2.21.2205131727070.10656@angie.orcam.me.uk> <02a1d5a9-4a95-ce58-d401-962d8ea5a0a2@gmail.com> <c6f4a479-6689-1ce6-60fb-c24f2635ad28@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 14 May 2022, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:

> > Shouldn't this patch be squashed into [1/2]?
> > 
> 
> Oops, I mean patch [1/3].

 Possibly, but I chose to keep one self-contained change per patch as per 
the cover letter and also concluded it makes no sense to wire the document 
while it's still broken.  I'm leaving it up to the maintainers to decide 
and I will repost an updated change if required.

  Maciej