Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc:     Openrisc <openrisc@lists.librecores.org>,
        Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
        Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
        Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: [PATCH 10/13] openrisc/time: Fix symbol scope warnings
Date:   Sun, 15 May 2022 21:41:55 +0900
Message-Id: <20220515124158.3167452-11-shorne@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220515124158.3167452-1-shorne@gmail.com>
References: <20220515124158.3167452-1-shorne@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Spare reported the following warnings:
    arch/openrisc/kernel/time.c:64:1: warning: symbol 'clockevent_openrisc_timer' was not declared. Should it be static?
    arch/openrisc/kernel/time.c:66:6: warning: symbol 'openrisc_clockevent_init' was not declared. Should it be static?

This patch fixes by:

 - Add static declaration to clockevent_openrisc_timer as it's used only in
   this file.
 - Add include for asm/time.h for openrisc_clockevent_init declaration.

Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
---
 arch/openrisc/kernel/time.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/openrisc/kernel/time.c b/arch/openrisc/kernel/time.c
index 6d18989d63d0..8e26c1af5441 100644
--- a/arch/openrisc/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/openrisc/kernel/time.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 #include <linux/of_clk.h>
 
 #include <asm/cpuinfo.h>
+#include <asm/time.h>
 
 /* Test the timer ticks to count, used in sync routine */
 inline void openrisc_timer_set(unsigned long count)
@@ -61,7 +62,7 @@ static int openrisc_timer_set_next_event(unsigned long delta,
  * timers) we cannot enable the PERIODIC feature.  The tick timer can run using
  * one-shot events, so no problem.
  */
-DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct clock_event_device, clockevent_openrisc_timer);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct clock_event_device, clockevent_openrisc_timer);
 
 void openrisc_clockevent_init(void)
 {
-- 
2.31.1