Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759309AbXENGJv (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2007 02:09:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757941AbXENGJn (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2007 02:09:43 -0400 Received: from smtp-101-monday.nerim.net ([62.4.16.101]:3450 "EHLO kraid.nerim.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757722AbXENGJn (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2007 02:09:43 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 08:10:22 +0200 From: Jean Delvare To: "Antonino Ingargiola" Cc: "Linus Torvalds" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc1 Message-ID: <20070514081022.7fcee97f@hyperion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <5486cca80705131150u313eeb43i30bf040e160ac419@mail.gmail.com> References: <5486cca80705131010h2011487dnc948a3c57ce6decc@mail.gmail.com> <5486cca80705131150u313eeb43i30bf040e160ac419@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.5 (GTK+ 2.10.6; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2699 Lines: 69 Hi Antonino, hi Linus, On Sun, 13 May 2007 20:50:54 +0200, Antonino Ingargiola wrote: > 2007/5/13, Linus Torvalds : > > On Sun, 13 May 2007, Antonino Ingargiola wrote: > > > > > > On my desktop pc with Debian Etch and 2.6.22-rc1 the gnome panel > > > applet "Sensors Applet" give an error message "No chip detected". > > > Works fine on 2.6.21.1 (it show cpu temperature) with the same config > > > (I've only only done make oldconfig). I am not familiar with the gnome sensors applet. Does it say where it is getting the data (driver name, device name...)? > > One thing to check is that "make oldconfig" can actually change the > > configuration if things were moved behind a new top-level configuration > > parameter or such. I'm not saying that's the case here, but it's possible > > that things like the i2c changes might have made you inadvertedly changed > > some config option. > > I suspected so. However the acpi and i2c section of the two config are > identical. I report the only selected options: > > Power management options (ACPI, APM) ---> > [*] Power Management support > [*] Software Suspend (Hibernation) > ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power Interface) Support ---> > [*] ACPI Support > [*] Sleep States > Button > Video > Fan > Processor > Thermal Zone > (0) Disable ACPI for systems before Jan 1st this year > > Device Drivers ---> > I2C support ---> > I2C device interface > I2C Hardware Bus support ---> > VIA VT82C596/82C686/82xx and CX700 You forgot to list the Hardware Monitoring support options. > > > Is this considered a regression or can be due to userland incompatibilities? > > > > It's a regression, although I'd like to know more about your cases. It's > > just hard to tell what happened: was it a i2c/hwmon driver that got > > broken, or is it some sysfs file that got buggered, or what.. > > > > For example, "dmesg" output before and after (preferably as a diff between > > the two), and what modules you had loaded in the working/nonworking case. > > The first column of lsmod list the same modules in both kernels. The > diff-ed dmesg is attached. Please provide the output of lsmod. If you are using one of the following drivers: lm78, smsc47b397, smsc47m1, w83627hf or w83781d, you need lm_sensors >= 2.10.1 (libsensors.so.3.1.1 or later). -- Jean Delvare - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/