Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 18:35:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 18:34:00 -0500 Received: from ausmtp01.au.ibm.COM ([202.135.136.97]:64643 "EHLO ausmtp01.au.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 18:32:28 -0500 Subject: Coding style - a non-issue To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.8 June 18, 2001 Message-ID: From: "Peter Waltenberg" Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 09:29:26 +1000 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on d23m0206/23/M/IBM(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 29/11/2001 10:31:40 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The problem was solved years ago. "man indent" Someone who cares, come up with an indentrc for the kernel code, and get it into Documentation/CodingStyle If the maintainers run all new code through indent with that indentrc before checkin, the problem goes away. The only one who'll incur any pain then is a code submitter who didn't follow the rules. (Exactly the person we want to be in pain ;)). Then we can all get on with doing useful things. Cheers Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/