Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 19:07:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 19:07:23 -0500 Received: from zero.tech9.net ([209.61.188.187]:50186 "EHLO zero.tech9.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 19:07:18 -0500 Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre1 From: Robert Love To: Mark Hymers Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011129000509.A1362@markcomp.blaydon.hymers.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <1006991294.813.0.camel@phantasy> <20011129000509.A1362@markcomp.blaydon.hymers.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.99.2 (Preview Release) Date: 28 Nov 2001 19:06:57 -0500 Message-Id: <1006992428.13159.8.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2001-11-28 at 19:05, Mark Hymers wrote: > Do you know what the legal status of the rest of the *.c files in fs/nls > is? There are still quite a few which have no MODULE_LICENSE tag at all > which causes the kernel to be tainted (IMO) incorrectly. I believe all the fs/nls files are GPL or Dual GPL/something else. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/