Received: by 2002:a6b:500f:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e15csp236752iob; Wed, 18 May 2022 00:44:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwC78EYUzzHiWJiXtj7SreP4EwkK5zBJ2PGyzr2zUn55nFAnSOGxBt3e89xI66JRTLFz28A X-Received: by 2002:a63:220e:0:b0:3c6:d818:19ff with SMTP id i14-20020a63220e000000b003c6d81819ffmr22065861pgi.486.1652859857570; Wed, 18 May 2022 00:44:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1652859857; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Svq4LdZRE0MLEXVAOg958rzgDuk5hJWYdC8SdvlynT/luMhbiq3Ts9wZz/xLpN4xM4 09F4dJUGqHU6sgvB97zZSHxt4VPH6T8Y5bGPelkYT34sJZXezfpTnxyhTp/383pkMBiE 7oCJ/cvkmTnPGTtg34i7RXYHdkj5sO3yTHoVwixd5FtoLDCzTUlMz6LjyurClw2vghT8 d+QFtDEPnbEZGNPFSeHy6GIGHkZojln71B+H4DupCVkdkvGsAARYmFVZtwzcZRbzq2Gd e3Gz6CBkRbOy3G/RjU5NiyhzTzUzaoeX3Zg8dNAvVtjEMh95eTB+HyQnwG20XBdxVKgV k8eg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=2HTxvo1kk2tFZF8qxCKrxGn1kKfuDGsgIu3o9brtrrM=; b=wEESmILixQm7iTR6c5qCoAuzs+9xQ/mXjgPh7uIv2nzDREUN90iAGYMpGjl32KI7yo m+F8S7y9zXRDLoOzRk8lzCCLzrV3PtPcRPmo9kVtz7hEzZTricxsLhG/pqciOBbLLJ9H /2pojGe2cien58olxZ+T9uilgjvJy6mCnLbWTGEmv0Zs1FyO0LRlhmB1TXXCilLuHYQb q7L6q989aWCc3l9l5/Td7OP1jI9F4qZA3FyVUHAn0ML0NemKa0KCiHHI7DR+cAqqlGAh e83d9vq5VAjbIo8xpzWIGBWi3KRK5TsLeaB2+K3NqmJSsczHiTVGi7T/6BveHkNJA3U9 N1+Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=sBO3h8jE; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net. [2620:137:e000::1:18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u21-20020a17090ae01500b001d4e0d81848si5410758pjy.152.2022.05.18.00.44.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 18 May 2022 00:44:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=sBO3h8jE; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 125482AC58; Wed, 18 May 2022 00:44:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232367AbiERHnz (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 18 May 2022 03:43:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33080 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232318AbiERHnw (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 May 2022 03:43:52 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x331.google.com (mail-wm1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::331]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C3405F6C for ; Wed, 18 May 2022 00:43:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id i20-20020a05600c355400b0039456976dcaso1897667wmq.1 for ; Wed, 18 May 2022 00:43:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2HTxvo1kk2tFZF8qxCKrxGn1kKfuDGsgIu3o9brtrrM=; b=sBO3h8jE+avzr3bgpvys3cSiHWFd9iMk3i+qcpKqcqUn7Nn19qhCDm5AsvjWF/Q/P8 kF+iS7Gz5TIy3N7nrh+3PYEzQUvIPJrSdTOaL3dJLUZhUkhFJyRYpRRuf68h5G3V7sQE fiNSwDPGxtfTXYzr+0L9JRszvW5ZBazCYW1s+S5OFTr4LkNJfMsr5VXV1iicuc6GuuAo z7T97WgDwN4fbdkwg7QkSCnmaZtBdjIMLpDTf/ECKNO46BYY0TnyejTKQ5+IbZ9qwBHM aByO2QpZFLXcStrC9sPnDIJ9aUXbBc7+0yJ6p0vIlBRGGHNulYCJLJVq6SwPyEC3a4YO m9xw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2HTxvo1kk2tFZF8qxCKrxGn1kKfuDGsgIu3o9brtrrM=; b=iL7/z7WWNft123igqPvmL/oyfQBTQGthRMqycCn6kWmFbLxo0JCzAgAvVsx57v+vUt 8waw0Lyxt5ppXBCzkyFbyegM9ni25zyiNpCp1NuF3D3iZS6LdlQfm91p51dYUF667sRB hDWuquTPZBuoJ+GVlKlIjzWLQ5WbYzNgVpy6IwL4thCBf/tr3JbzJnY05D/SAS+cnU7F lxB3XUaDaB8PoHjuEJNhrwxjzkSMBclksBmJhTtx1k7y+t4Ijvz5BZe+nXL0ylZ59uQ/ 8h+5wTnpZ2ZLYnPAdMHi/PL/WQoA1uR/NUal0Xo5OXrMApOq8D0qNiG0rrAeqem6eecR ksHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533c7eJ4eoTLg3aiKQZpU9tuZKCA8mEoPIukIVJdnO2VS1F03nhG T6OM6f5SI6Fo73MpFrK6HPSBJZ5n9t6N/1BXGH0caw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1f08:b0:394:9060:bb54 with SMTP id bd8-20020a05600c1f0800b003949060bb54mr24868499wmb.73.1652859826622; Wed, 18 May 2022 00:43:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220516194730.1546328-1-dlatypov@google.com> <20220516194730.1546328-2-dlatypov@google.com> In-Reply-To: <20220516194730.1546328-2-dlatypov@google.com> From: David Gow Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 15:43:35 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] kunit: tool: redo how we construct and mock LinuxSourceTree To: Daniel Latypov Cc: Brendan Higgins , Linux Kernel Mailing List , KUnit Development , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , Shuah Khan Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 3:48 AM 'Daniel Latypov' via KUnit Development wrote: > > Our main function currently has an optional `linux` argument which is > used to by our unit tests to inject a mock. > We currently have the same code copy-pasted several times to do > if not linux: > linux = MakeRealInstance(cli_args.foo, cli_args.bar, ...) > > But in python, dependency injection isn't necessary or idiomatic when we > can just use mock.patch() to mock things out. > > This change > 1. adds a helper to create a LinuxSourceTree from the cli_args > 2. drops the `linux` parameter in favor of mocking the __init__ func. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov > --- This is much cleaner, thanks. Reviewed-by: David Gow Cheers, -- David > tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 49 ++++-------- > tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 103 ++++++++++++------------- > 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py > index 13bd72e47da8..8a90d80ee66e 100755 > --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py > +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py > @@ -365,7 +365,18 @@ def add_parse_opts(parser) -> None: > 'filename is specified', > type=str, const='stdout', default=None, metavar='FILE') > > -def main(argv, linux=None): > + > +def tree_from_args(cli_args: argparse.Namespace) -> kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree: > + """Returns a LinuxSourceTree based on the user's arguments.""" > + return kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir, > + kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig, > + kconfig_add=cli_args.kconfig_add, > + arch=cli_args.arch, > + cross_compile=cli_args.cross_compile, > + qemu_config_path=cli_args.qemu_config) > + > + > +def main(argv): > parser = argparse.ArgumentParser( > description='Helps writing and running KUnit tests.') > subparser = parser.add_subparsers(dest='subcommand') > @@ -412,14 +423,7 @@ def main(argv, linux=None): > if not os.path.exists(cli_args.build_dir): > os.mkdir(cli_args.build_dir) > > - if not linux: > - linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir, > - kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig, > - kconfig_add=cli_args.kconfig_add, > - arch=cli_args.arch, > - cross_compile=cli_args.cross_compile, > - qemu_config_path=cli_args.qemu_config) > - > + linux = tree_from_args(cli_args) > request = KunitRequest(build_dir=cli_args.build_dir, > make_options=cli_args.make_options, > jobs=cli_args.jobs, > @@ -438,14 +442,7 @@ def main(argv, linux=None): > not os.path.exists(cli_args.build_dir)): > os.mkdir(cli_args.build_dir) > > - if not linux: > - linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir, > - kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig, > - kconfig_add=cli_args.kconfig_add, > - arch=cli_args.arch, > - cross_compile=cli_args.cross_compile, > - qemu_config_path=cli_args.qemu_config) > - > + linux = tree_from_args(cli_args) > request = KunitConfigRequest(build_dir=cli_args.build_dir, > make_options=cli_args.make_options) > result = config_tests(linux, request) > @@ -455,14 +452,7 @@ def main(argv, linux=None): > if result.status != KunitStatus.SUCCESS: > sys.exit(1) > elif cli_args.subcommand == 'build': > - if not linux: > - linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir, > - kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig, > - kconfig_add=cli_args.kconfig_add, > - arch=cli_args.arch, > - cross_compile=cli_args.cross_compile, > - qemu_config_path=cli_args.qemu_config) > - > + linux = tree_from_args(cli_args) > request = KunitBuildRequest(build_dir=cli_args.build_dir, > make_options=cli_args.make_options, > jobs=cli_args.jobs, > @@ -474,14 +464,7 @@ def main(argv, linux=None): > if result.status != KunitStatus.SUCCESS: > sys.exit(1) > elif cli_args.subcommand == 'exec': > - if not linux: > - linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir, > - kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig, > - kconfig_add=cli_args.kconfig_add, > - arch=cli_args.arch, > - cross_compile=cli_args.cross_compile, > - qemu_config_path=cli_args.qemu_config) > - > + linux = tree_from_args(cli_args) > exec_request = KunitExecRequest(raw_output=cli_args.raw_output, > build_dir=cli_args.build_dir, > json=cli_args.json, > diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py > index b9158017ece6..baee11d96474 100755 > --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py > +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py > @@ -503,24 +503,25 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): > self.print_mock = mock.patch('builtins.print').start() > self.addCleanup(mock.patch.stopall) > > - self.linux_source_mock = mock.Mock() > - self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig = mock.Mock(return_value=True) > - self.linux_source_mock.build_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=True) > - self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=all_passed_log) > + self.mock_linux_init = mock.patch.object(kunit_kernel, 'LinuxSourceTree').start() > + self.linux_source_mock = self.mock_linux_init.return_value > + self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.return_value = True > + self.linux_source_mock.build_kernel.return_value = True > + self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.return_value = all_passed_log > > def test_config_passes_args_pass(self): > - kunit.main(['config', '--build_dir=.kunit'], self.linux_source_mock) > + kunit.main(['config', '--build_dir=.kunit']) > self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) > self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 0) > > def test_build_passes_args_pass(self): > - kunit.main(['build'], self.linux_source_mock) > + kunit.main(['build']) > self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) > self.linux_source_mock.build_kernel.assert_called_once_with(False, kunit.get_default_jobs(), '.kunit', None) > self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 0) > > def test_exec_passes_args_pass(self): > - kunit.main(['exec'], self.linux_source_mock) > + kunit.main(['exec']) > self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 0) > self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 1) > self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with( > @@ -528,7 +529,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): > self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('Testing complete.')) > > def test_run_passes_args_pass(self): > - kunit.main(['run'], self.linux_source_mock) > + kunit.main(['run']) > self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) > self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 1) > self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with( > @@ -538,13 +539,13 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): > def test_exec_passes_args_fail(self): > self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=[]) > with self.assertRaises(SystemExit) as e: > - kunit.main(['exec'], self.linux_source_mock) > + kunit.main(['exec']) > self.assertEqual(e.exception.code, 1) > > def test_run_passes_args_fail(self): > self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=[]) > with self.assertRaises(SystemExit) as e: > - kunit.main(['run'], self.linux_source_mock) > + kunit.main(['run']) > self.assertEqual(e.exception.code, 1) > self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) > self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 1) > @@ -553,7 +554,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): > def test_exec_no_tests(self): > self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=['TAP version 14', '1..0']) > with self.assertRaises(SystemExit) as e: > - kunit.main(['run'], self.linux_source_mock) > + kunit.main(['run']) > self.assertEqual(e.exception.code, 1) > self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with( > args=None, build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='', timeout=300) > @@ -561,7 +562,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): > > def test_exec_raw_output(self): > self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=[]) > - kunit.main(['exec', '--raw_output'], self.linux_source_mock) > + kunit.main(['exec', '--raw_output']) > self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 1) > for call in self.print_mock.call_args_list: > self.assertNotEqual(call, mock.call(StrContains('Testing complete.'))) > @@ -569,7 +570,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): > > def test_run_raw_output(self): > self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=[]) > - kunit.main(['run', '--raw_output'], self.linux_source_mock) > + kunit.main(['run', '--raw_output']) > self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) > self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 1) > for call in self.print_mock.call_args_list: > @@ -578,7 +579,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): > > def test_run_raw_output_kunit(self): > self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=[]) > - kunit.main(['run', '--raw_output=kunit'], self.linux_source_mock) > + kunit.main(['run', '--raw_output=kunit']) > self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) > self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 1) > for call in self.print_mock.call_args_list: > @@ -588,27 +589,27 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): > def test_run_raw_output_invalid(self): > self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=[]) > with self.assertRaises(SystemExit) as e: > - kunit.main(['run', '--raw_output=invalid'], self.linux_source_mock) > + kunit.main(['run', '--raw_output=invalid']) > self.assertNotEqual(e.exception.code, 0) > > def test_run_raw_output_does_not_take_positional_args(self): > # --raw_output is a string flag, but we don't want it to consume > # any positional arguments, only ones after an '=' > self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=[]) > - kunit.main(['run', '--raw_output', 'filter_glob'], self.linux_source_mock) > + kunit.main(['run', '--raw_output', 'filter_glob']) > self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with( > args=None, build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='filter_glob', timeout=300) > > def test_exec_timeout(self): > timeout = 3453 > - kunit.main(['exec', '--timeout', str(timeout)], self.linux_source_mock) > + kunit.main(['exec', '--timeout', str(timeout)]) > self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with( > args=None, build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='', timeout=timeout) > self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('Testing complete.')) > > def test_run_timeout(self): > timeout = 3453 > - kunit.main(['run', '--timeout', str(timeout)], self.linux_source_mock) > + kunit.main(['run', '--timeout', str(timeout)]) > self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) > self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with( > args=None, build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='', timeout=timeout) > @@ -616,7 +617,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): > > def test_run_builddir(self): > build_dir = '.kunit' > - kunit.main(['run', '--build_dir=.kunit'], self.linux_source_mock) > + kunit.main(['run', '--build_dir=.kunit']) > self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) > self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with( > args=None, build_dir=build_dir, filter_glob='', timeout=300) > @@ -624,60 +625,54 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): > > def test_config_builddir(self): > build_dir = '.kunit' > - kunit.main(['config', '--build_dir', build_dir], self.linux_source_mock) > + kunit.main(['config', '--build_dir', build_dir]) > self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) > > def test_build_builddir(self): > build_dir = '.kunit' > jobs = kunit.get_default_jobs() > - kunit.main(['build', '--build_dir', build_dir], self.linux_source_mock) > + kunit.main(['build', '--build_dir', build_dir]) > self.linux_source_mock.build_kernel.assert_called_once_with(False, jobs, build_dir, None) > > def test_exec_builddir(self): > build_dir = '.kunit' > - kunit.main(['exec', '--build_dir', build_dir], self.linux_source_mock) > + kunit.main(['exec', '--build_dir', build_dir]) > self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with( > args=None, build_dir=build_dir, filter_glob='', timeout=300) > self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('Testing complete.')) > > - @mock.patch.object(kunit_kernel, 'LinuxSourceTree') > - def test_run_kunitconfig(self, mock_linux_init): > - mock_linux_init.return_value = self.linux_source_mock > + def test_run_kunitconfig(self): > kunit.main(['run', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig']) > # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here. > - mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', > - kunitconfig_path='mykunitconfig', > - kconfig_add=None, > - arch='um', > - cross_compile=None, > - qemu_config_path=None) > - > - @mock.patch.object(kunit_kernel, 'LinuxSourceTree') > - def test_config_kunitconfig(self, mock_linux_init): > - mock_linux_init.return_value = self.linux_source_mock > + self.mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', > + kunitconfig_path='mykunitconfig', > + kconfig_add=None, > + arch='um', > + cross_compile=None, > + qemu_config_path=None) > + > + def test_config_kunitconfig(self): > kunit.main(['config', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig']) > # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here. > - mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', > - kunitconfig_path='mykunitconfig', > - kconfig_add=None, > - arch='um', > - cross_compile=None, > - qemu_config_path=None) > - > - @mock.patch.object(kunit_kernel, 'LinuxSourceTree') > - def test_run_kconfig_add(self, mock_linux_init): > - mock_linux_init.return_value = self.linux_source_mock > + self.mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', > + kunitconfig_path='mykunitconfig', > + kconfig_add=None, > + arch='um', > + cross_compile=None, > + qemu_config_path=None) > + > + def test_run_kconfig_add(self): > kunit.main(['run', '--kconfig_add=CONFIG_KASAN=y', '--kconfig_add=CONFIG_KCSAN=y']) > # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here. > - mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', > - kunitconfig_path=None, > - kconfig_add=['CONFIG_KASAN=y', 'CONFIG_KCSAN=y'], > - arch='um', > - cross_compile=None, > - qemu_config_path=None) > + self.mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', > + kunitconfig_path=None, > + kconfig_add=['CONFIG_KASAN=y', 'CONFIG_KCSAN=y'], > + arch='um', > + cross_compile=None, > + qemu_config_path=None) > > def test_run_kernel_args(self): > - kunit.main(['run', '--kernel_args=a=1', '--kernel_args=b=2'], self.linux_source_mock) > + kunit.main(['run', '--kernel_args=a=1', '--kernel_args=b=2']) > self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) > self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with( > args=['a=1','b=2'], build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='', timeout=300) > @@ -699,7 +694,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): > @mock.patch.object(kunit, '_list_tests') > def test_run_isolated_by_suite(self, mock_tests): > mock_tests.return_value = ['suite.test1', 'suite.test2', 'suite2.test1'] > - kunit.main(['exec', '--run_isolated=suite', 'suite*.test*'], self.linux_source_mock) > + kunit.main(['exec', '--run_isolated=suite', 'suite*.test*']) > > # Should respect the user's filter glob when listing tests. > mock_tests.assert_called_once_with(mock.ANY, > @@ -712,7 +707,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): > @mock.patch.object(kunit, '_list_tests') > def test_run_isolated_by_test(self, mock_tests): > mock_tests.return_value = ['suite.test1', 'suite.test2', 'suite2.test1'] > - kunit.main(['exec', '--run_isolated=test', 'suite*'], self.linux_source_mock) > + kunit.main(['exec', '--run_isolated=test', 'suite*']) > > # Should respect the user's filter glob when listing tests. > mock_tests.assert_called_once_with(mock.ANY, > -- > 2.36.1.124.g0e6072fb45-goog > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "KUnit Development" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kunit-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kunit-dev/20220516194730.1546328-2-dlatypov%40google.com.