Received: by 2002:a6b:500f:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e15csp287828iob; Wed, 18 May 2022 02:10:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzMOPzgHAQhfnzr0M0orFXYy7yZURNQ4rp70MFiJ0FLdvnQM3JCnjzlNltr8Lw5w5sb0Ds8 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ea0f:b0:15e:afcf:d1a4 with SMTP id s15-20020a170902ea0f00b0015eafcfd1a4mr26411879plg.96.1652865017277; Wed, 18 May 2022 02:10:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1652865017; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=HRoFMpenmUlP+uwQ9xM1vt+RCIIs5+hag+IFw/yB88AmJ/J8q6Kbb+1TfzKkUZ1+vs 0zBbn+ZPpRryhhCH38ZUX9JD9iCmbv3Euk7jIC0TvV/sU8+heR+nJKoIGtLn7jI2/wk6 Te562VKl+ewUXZGZybWpXKO+FQs+l/suuCO/O9sn5HnFEdAZJ/e/ehBFl+aOYNUhfnsm 47LJZU5J4OT0Lo2meHI/fZDm8aytjzTu0eokBAe9bZPfkt/lFeA0FQt9Eql6SFg4Nd4C /uLfVD67LUPDc10cDMQ2UerYqNcl4Ys5I2gtdj2q9saM2ylkxon/LrgNnoWG89Ac1J5K VARA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=MQayXS7toEt02uuvnMfbB/ROm+SFrYUzGo8GqXCHgoQ=; b=QwsKH7gCIXYtb+DIcHIAUFfAuLVIAfyQm6j+ikXA7hncbRbuK6Atlt+o0WI+qhQoWQ E3S1xRYhKqmCujTu2TSJwfBDH0ZEYUU/b1Oa7l1dXm7C5BlROnlTZXdaSXQKmqlP38RY gA/bhGMriGJU7ImHBOPcur2+0HucpdVC2B0YS0LIMg5108E+0qfCN1l3kIRgJEoVJat0 ZcyYxTJyDg8w2PE6ZdWjA48X/SWA2bCTb4g4q/vaqFUMZMmrlCK1aP6h6ZXghVw9w0xe PIODVGrb7f6sCcgAi/rh0r4Y+UEPUuxLguKPA4OpMEASdgNxA/HIjCeNdV35mlKfEhpN l7hQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net. [2620:137:e000::1:18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p21-20020a170902a41500b0015eb33b2f0asi1823379plq.525.2022.05.18.02.10.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 18 May 2022 02:10:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88D213FD7D; Wed, 18 May 2022 02:09:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233845AbiERJJj (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 18 May 2022 05:09:39 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35564 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233833AbiERJJ3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 May 2022 05:09:29 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E7713F929; Wed, 18 May 2022 02:09:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB0F2106F; Wed, 18 May 2022 02:09:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pierre123.arm.com (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CAE393F66F; Wed, 18 May 2022 02:09:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Pierre Gondois To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ionela.Voinescu@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, Pierre Gondois , Pierre Gondois , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Viresh Kumar , Robert Moore , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] ACPI: CPPC: Assume no transition latency if no PCCT Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 11:08:59 +0200 Message-Id: <20220518090901.2724518-3-pierre.gondois@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20220518090901.2724518-1-pierre.gondois@arm.com> References: <20220518090901.2724518-1-pierre.gondois@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Pierre Gondois The transition_delay_us (struct cpufreq_policy) is currently defined as: Preferred average time interval between consecutive invocations of the driver to set the frequency for this policy. To be set by the scaling driver (0, which is the default, means no preference). The transition_latency represents the amount of time necessary for a CPU to change its frequency. A PCCT table advertises mutliple values: - pcc_nominal: Expected latency to process a command, in microseconds - pcc_mpar: The maximum number of periodic requests that the subspace channel can support, reported in commands per minute. 0 indicates no limitation. - pcc_mrtt: The minimum amount of time that OSPM must wait after the completion of a command before issuing the next command, in microseconds. cppc_get_transition_latency() allows to get the max of them. commit d4f3388afd48 ("cpufreq / CPPC: Set platform specific transition_delay_us") allows to select transition_delay_us based on the platform, and fallbacks to cppc_get_transition_latency() otherwise. If _CPC objects are not using PCC channels (no PPCT table), the transition_delay_us is set to CPUFREQ_ETERNAL, leading to really long periods between frequency updates (~4s). If the desired_reg, where performance requests are written, is in SystemMemory or SystemIo ACPI address space, there is no delay in requests. So return 0 instead of CPUFREQ_ETERNAL, leading to transition_delay_us being set to LATENCY_MULTIPLIER us (1000 us). This patch also adds two macros to check the address spaces. Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla --- drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c index 6f09fe011544..840223c12540 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c @@ -100,6 +100,16 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpc_desc *, cpc_desc_ptr); (cpc)->cpc_entry.reg.space_id == \ ACPI_ADR_SPACE_PLATFORM_COMM) +/* Check if a CPC register is in SystemMemory */ +#define CPC_IN_SYSTEM_MEMORY(cpc) ((cpc)->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER && \ + (cpc)->cpc_entry.reg.space_id == \ + ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY) + +/* Check if a CPC register is in SystemIo */ +#define CPC_IN_SYSTEM_IO(cpc) ((cpc)->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER && \ + (cpc)->cpc_entry.reg.space_id == \ + ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO) + /* Evaluates to True if reg is a NULL register descriptor */ #define IS_NULL_REG(reg) ((reg)->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY && \ (reg)->address == 0 && \ @@ -1456,6 +1466,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cppc_set_perf); * transition latency for performance change requests. The closest we have * is the timing information from the PCCT tables which provides the info * on the number and frequency of PCC commands the platform can handle. + * + * If desired_reg is in the SystemMemory or SystemIo ACPI address space, + * then assume there is no latency. */ unsigned int cppc_get_transition_latency(int cpu_num) { @@ -1481,7 +1494,9 @@ unsigned int cppc_get_transition_latency(int cpu_num) return CPUFREQ_ETERNAL; desired_reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[DESIRED_PERF]; - if (!CPC_IN_PCC(desired_reg)) + if (CPC_IN_SYSTEM_MEMORY(desired_reg) || CPC_IN_SYSTEM_IO(desired_reg)) + return 0; + else if (!CPC_IN_PCC(desired_reg)) return CPUFREQ_ETERNAL; if (pcc_ss_id < 0) -- 2.25.1