Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Date:   Wed, 18 May 2022 17:57:35 +0800
From:   Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
To:     James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
        broonie@kernel.org, acme@kernel.org, german.gomez@arm.com,
        mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, john.garry@huawei.com,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] perf tools: arm64: Add support for VG register
Message-ID: <20220518095735.GB430350@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
References: <20220517102005.3022017-1-james.clark@arm.com>
 <20220517102005.3022017-5-james.clark@arm.com>
 <20220517131952.GE153558@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
 <ca02e8f5-04bd-01ff-7b57-0fd08a1e2359@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ca02e8f5-04bd-01ff-7b57-0fd08a1e2359@arm.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 10:44:57AM +0100, James Clark wrote:

[...]

> >> +	if (getauxval(AT_HWCAP) & HWCAP_SVE)
> >> +		attr.sample_regs_user |= SMPL_REG_MASK(PERF_REG_ARM64_VG);
> >> +
> >> +	/*
> >> +	 * Check if the pmu supports perf extended regs, before
> >> +	 * returning the register mask to sample.
> >> +	 */
> >> +	if (attr.sample_regs_user != PERF_REGS_MASK) {
> >> +		event_attr_init(&attr);
> >> +		fd = sys_perf_event_open(&attr, 0, -1, -1, 0);
> >> +		if (fd != -1) {
> >> +			close(fd);
> >> +			return attr.sample_regs_user;
> >> +		}
> >> +	}
> > 
> > Just curious, since we can know SVE is supported from reading
> > auxiliary value, can we directly return the register mask as below?
> > 
> >   PERF_REGS_MASK | SMPL_REG_MASK(PERF_REG_ARM64_VG);
> 
> I was trying to cover the case where the system supports SVE, but
> the kernel doesn't have my changes to add the VG register yet.
> 
> Technically I could just attempt to open the event without checking
> for SVE first and see if it works or not. But I preferred to be
> explicit so it's obvious why we're doing that.

Understand; LGTM.

Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>