Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Message-ID: <87df1eda7d8e28f49a92def8bfe4d549494d2db0.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 29/39] rtc: add HAS_IOPORT dependencies
From:   Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
        "open list:REAL TIME CLOCK (RTC) SUBSYSTEM" 
        <linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 18 May 2022 15:47:17 +0200
In-Reply-To: <YoQeagVSRyaeA+vd@mail.local>
References: <20220429135108.2781579-1-schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
         <20220429135108.2781579-52-schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
         <YoQeagVSRyaeA+vd@mail.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 2022-05-18 at 00:15 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 29/04/2022 15:50:49+0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> > In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> > not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for
> > those drivers using them.
> > 
> 
> I'm fine taking that this cycle if there are no dependencies. Should I?
> 

I'd say the dependency here is the first patch in the series and we
don't seem to have full consensus on this yet. So as of now I sadly
don't think so.