Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Message-ID: <899706c6-0aac-b039-4b67-4e509ff0930d@hartkopp.net>
Date:   Wed, 18 May 2022 16:55:48 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.8.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] can: skb:: move can_dropped_invalid_skb and
 can_skb_headroom_valid to skb.c
Content-Language: en-US
From:   Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
To:     Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Cc:     Vincent MAILHOL <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>,
        Max Staudt <max@enpas.org>, linux-can@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
References: <e054f6d4-7ed1-98ac-8364-425f4ef0f760@hartkopp.net>
 <20220517141404.578d188a.max@enpas.org>
 <20220517122153.4r6n6kkbdslsa2hv@pengutronix.de>
 <20220517143921.08458f2c.max@enpas.org>
 <0b505b1f-1ee4-5a2c-3bbf-6e9822f78817@hartkopp.net>
 <CAMZ6RqJ0iCsHT-D5VuYQ9fk42ZEjHStU1yW0RfX1zuJpk5rVtQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <43768ff7-71f8-a6c3-18f8-28609e49eedd@hartkopp.net>
 <20220518132811.xfmwms2cu3bfxgrp@pengutronix.de>
 <CAMZ6RqJqeNjAtoDWADHsWocgbSXqQixcebJBhiBFS8BVeKCb3g@mail.gmail.com>
 <3dbe135e-d13c-5c5d-e7e4-b9c13b820fb8@hartkopp.net>
 <20220518143613.2a7alnw6vtkw7ct2@pengutronix.de>
 <482fd87a-df5a-08f7-522b-898d68c3b04a@hartkopp.net>
In-Reply-To: <482fd87a-df5a-08f7-522b-898d68c3b04a@hartkopp.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 18.05.22 16:38, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> 
> 
> On 18.05.22 16:36, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> On 18.05.2022 16:33:58, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> 
>>> I would suggest to remove the Kconfig entry but not all the code 
>>> inside the
>>> drivers, so that a volunteer can convert the LED support based on the
>>> existing trigger points in the drivers code later.
>>
>> The generic netdev LED trigger code doesn't need any support in the
>> netdev driver.
> 
> Oh! Yes, then it could be removed. Sorry for not looking that deep into it.

I can send a patch for this removal too. That's an easy step which might 
get into 5.19 then.

Best regards,
Oliver